On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 19:44:41 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 03:45:20PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
quoted
We want the MTU normalization logic to apply each time
dsa_port_bridge_join is called, so instead of chasing all callers of
that function, we should move the call within the bridge_join function
itself.
Fixes: 185c9a760a61 ("net: dsa: call dsa_port_bridge_join when joining a LAG that is already in a bridge")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
I forgot to rebase this patch on top of 'net' and now I notice that it
conflicts with the switchdev_bridge_port_offload() work.
Do we feel that the issue this patch fixes isn't too big and the patch
can go into net-next, to avoid conflicts and all that?
The commit message doesn't really describe the impact so hard to judge,
but either way you want to go - we'll need a repost so it can be build
tested.
Conflicts are not a huge deal. Obviously always best to wait for trees
to merge if that fixes things, but if net has dependency on net-next
you should just describe what you want the resolution to look like we
should be able to execute :)