Re: [PATCH net 1/4] bnxt: don't lock the tx queue from napi poll
flat view
From: Edwin Peer <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-11 20:14:01
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 12:32 PM Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
We can't take the tx lock from the napi poll routine, because netpoll can poll napi at any moment, including with the tx lock already held. It seems that the tx lock is only protecting against the disable path, appropriate barriers are already in place to make sure cleanup can safely run concurrently with start_xmit. I don't see any other reason why 'stopped && avail > thresh' needs to be re-checked under the lock. Remove the tx lock and use synchronize_net() to make sure closing the device does not race we restarting the queues. Annotate accesses to dev_state against data races. Fixes: c0c050c58d84 ("bnxt_en: New Broadcom ethernet driver.") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> --- drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 21 ++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c index 865fcb8cf29f..07827d6b0fec 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c@@ -730,15 +730,10 @@ static void bnxt_tx_int(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_napi *bnapi, int nr_pkts) */ smp_mb(); - if (unlikely(netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq)) && - (bnxt_tx_avail(bp, txr) > bp->tx_wake_thresh)) { - __netif_tx_lock(txq, smp_processor_id()); - if (netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq) && - bnxt_tx_avail(bp, txr) > bp->tx_wake_thresh && - txr->dev_state != BNXT_DEV_STATE_CLOSING) - netif_tx_wake_queue(txq); - __netif_tx_unlock(txq); - } + if (netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq) &&
Probably worth retaining the unlikely() that the original outer check had.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ bnxt_tx_avail(bp, txr) > bp->tx_wake_thresh && + READ_ONCE(txr->dev_state) != BNXT_DEV_STATE_CLOSING) + netif_tx_wake_queue(txq); } static struct page *__bnxt_alloc_rx_page(struct bnxt *bp, dma_addr_t *mapping,@@ -9264,9 +9259,11 @@ void bnxt_tx_disable(struct bnxt *bp) if (bp->tx_ring) { for (i = 0; i < bp->tx_nr_rings; i++) { txr = &bp->tx_ring[i]; - txr->dev_state = BNXT_DEV_STATE_CLOSING; + WRITE_ONCE(txr->dev_state, BNXT_DEV_STATE_CLOSING); } } + /* Make sure napi polls see @dev_state change */ + synchronize_net(); /* Drop carrier first to prevent TX timeout */ netif_carrier_off(bp->dev); /* Stop all TX queues */@@ -9280,8 +9277,10 @@ void bnxt_tx_enable(struct bnxt *bp) for (i = 0; i < bp->tx_nr_rings; i++) { txr = &bp->tx_ring[i]; - txr->dev_state = 0; + WRITE_ONCE(txr->dev_state, 0); } + /* Make sure napi polls see @dev_state change */ + synchronize_net(); netif_tx_wake_all_queues(bp->dev); if (bp->link_info.link_up) netif_carrier_on(bp->dev); --2.31.1
Regards, Edwin Peer