Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 3 authors, 2021-08-10

Re: [PATCH net] bareudp: Fix invalid read beyond skb's linear data

From: Guillaume Nault <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-08 16:16:32

On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 04:22:34PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 17:52:06 +0200 Guillaume Nault wrote:
quoted
Data beyond the UDP header might not be part of the skb's linear data.
Use skb_copy_bits() instead of direct access to skb->data+X, so that
we read the correct bytes even on a fragmented skb.

Fixes: 4b5f67232d95 ("net: Special handling for IP & MPLS.")
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/bareudp.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bareudp.c b/drivers/net/bareudp.c
index a7ee0af1af90..54e321a695ce 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bareudp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bareudp.c
@@ -71,12 +71,18 @@ static int bareudp_udp_encap_recv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		family = AF_INET6;
 
 	if (bareudp->ethertype == htons(ETH_P_IP)) {
-		struct iphdr *iphdr;
+		__u8 ipversion;
 
-		iphdr = (struct iphdr *)(skb->data + BAREUDP_BASE_HLEN);
-		if (iphdr->version == 4) {
-			proto = bareudp->ethertype;
-		} else if (bareudp->multi_proto_mode && (iphdr->version == 6)) {
+		if (skb_copy_bits(skb, BAREUDP_BASE_HLEN, &ipversion,
+				  sizeof(ipversion))) {
No preference just curious - could skb_header_pointer() be better suited?
I have no preference either. I just used skb_copy_bits() because it
didn't seem useful to get a pointer to the buffer (just to read one
byte of data).

But I don't mind reposting with skb_header_pointer() if anyone prefers
that solution.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help