Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] libbpf: rename btf__get_from_id() and btf__load() APIs, support split BTF
From: Quentin Monnet <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-28 21:54:35
Also in:
bpf
On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 at 21:49, Andrii Nakryiko [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(0, 6, "API that will be marked deprecated in v0.6")So I've been looking into this, and it's not _that_ simple to do. Unless I missed something about preprocessing macros, I cannot bake a "#if" in a "#define", to have the attribute printed if and only if the current version is >= 0.6 in this example. I've come up with something, but it is not optimal because I have to write a check and macros for each version number used with the LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE macro. If we really wanted to automate that part I guess we could generate a header with those macros from the Makefile and include it in libbpf_common.h, but that does not really look much cleaner to me.Yeah, let's not add unnecessary code generation. It sucks, of course, that we can't do #ifdef inside a macro :( So it's either do something like what you did with defining version-specific macros, which is actually not too bad, because it's not like we have tons of those versions anyways. LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(0, 6, "use btf__load_from_kernel_by_id instead") LIBBPF_API int btf__get_from_id(__u32 id, struct btf **btf); Alternatively, we can go with: #if LIBBPF_AT_OR_NEWER(0, 6) LIBBPF_DEPRECATED("use btf__load_from_kernel_by_id instead") #endif LIBBPF API int btf__get_from_id(__u32 id, struct btf **btf); I don't really dislike the second variant too much either, but LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE() reads nicer. Let's go with that. See some comments below about implementation.
Ok.
quoted
Here's my current code, below - does it correspond to what you had in mind? Or did you think of something else? ------diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile b/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile index ec14aa725bb0..095d5dc30d50 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ LIBBPF_VERSION := $(shell \ grep -oE '^LIBBPF_([0-9.]+)' libbpf.map | \ sort -rV | head -n1 | cut -d'_' -f2) LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION := $(firstword $(subst ., ,$(LIBBPF_VERSION))) +LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION := $(firstword $(subst ., ,$(subst $(LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION)., ,$(LIBBPF_VERSION))))Given all this is for internal use, I'd instead define something like __LIBBPF_CURVER as an integer that is easy to compare against: #define __LIBBPF_CURVER (LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION * 100 + LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION) * 100 + LIBBPF_PATCH_VERSION That will simplify some stuff below and is generally easier to use in code, if we will need this somewhere to use explicitly.
Did you mean computing __LIBBPF_CURVER in the Makefile, or in the header? I can do that if you want, although I'm not convinced it will simplify much. Instead of having one long-ish condition, we'll have to compute the integer for the current version, as well as for each of the versions that we list for deprecating functions. I suppose I can add another dedicated macro. Do you actually want the patch version? I chose to leave it aside because 1) I thought it would not be relevant for deprecating symbols, and 2) if anything like a -rc1 suffix is ever appended to the version, it makes it more complex to parse from the version string.
quoted
MAKEFLAGS += --no-print-directory@@ -86,6 +87,8 @@ override CFLAGS += -Werror -Wall override CFLAGS += $(INCLUDES) override CFLAGS += -fvisibility=hidden override CFLAGS += -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 +override CFLAGS += -DLIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION=$(LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION) +override CFLAGS += -DLIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION=$(LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION) # flags specific for shared library SHLIB_FLAGS := -DSHARED -fPICdiff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.h index cf8490f95641..8b6b5442dbd8 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.h +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.h@@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ LIBBPF_API struct btf *btf__parse_raw(const char *path); LIBBPF_API struct btf *btf__parse_raw_split(const char *path, struct btf *base_btf); LIBBPF_API struct btf *btf__load_from_kernel_by_id(__u32 id); LIBBPF_API struct btf *btf__load_from_kernel_by_id_split(__u32 id, struct btf *base_btf); -LIBBPF_API int btf__get_from_id(__u32 id, struct btf **btf); +LIBBPF_API LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(0, 6, "use btf__load_from_kernel_by_id instead")nit: given how long those deprecations will be, let's keep them at a separate (first) line and keep LIBBPF_API near the function declaration itself
I thought having the LIBBPF_API on a separate line would slightly reduce the risk, when moving lines around, to move the function prototype but not the deprecation attribute. But ok, fine.
quoted
+int btf__get_from_id(__u32 id, struct btf **btf); LIBBPF_API int btf__finalize_data(struct bpf_object *obj, struct btf *btf); LIBBPF_API int btf__load(struct btf *btf);diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_common.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_common.h index 947d8bd8a7bb..9ba9f8135dc8 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_common.h +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_common.h@@ -17,6 +17,28 @@ #define LIBBPF_DEPRECATED(msg) __attribute__((deprecated(msg))) +#ifndef LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCEwhy #ifndef conditional?
Right, we don't expect to have the macro defined elsewhere. I'll remove it.
quoted
+#define __LIBBPF_VERSION_CHECK(major, minor) \ + LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION > major || \ + (LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION == major && LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION >= minor)so we don't need this if we do __LIBBPF_CURVER
Right, but we do need to compute an integer for each of the versions listed below (0.6 for now). I'll see if I can come up with something short.
quoted
+ +/* Add checks for other versions below when planning deprecation of API symbols + * with the LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE macro. + */ +#if __LIBBPF_VERSION_CHECK(0, 6) +#define __LIBBPF_MARK_DEPRECATED_0_6(X) X +#else +#define __LIBBPF_MARK_DEPRECATED_0_6(X) +#endif + +#define __LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(major, minor, msg) \ + __LIBBPF_MARK_DEPRECATED_ ## major ## _ ## minor (LIBBPF_DEPRECATED("v" # major "." # minor "+, " msg)) + +/* Mark a symbol as deprecated when libbpf version is >= {major}.{minor} */ +#define LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(major, minor, msg) \ + __LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE(major, minor, msg)Is it needed for some macro value concatenation magic to have this nested __LIBBPF_DEPRECATED_SINCE?
I double-checked (I needed to, anyway), and it seems not. It's a leftover from an earlier version of my code, I'll clean it up before the proper submission. Thanks! Quentin