Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 2 authors, 2021-07-23

Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: increase supported cgroup storage value size

From: <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-23 23:23:42
Also in: bpf

On 07/23, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 05:27:47PM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
quoted
Current max cgroup storage value size is 4k (PAGE_SIZE). The other local
storages accept up to 64k (BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_MAX_VALUE_SIZE). Let's  
align
quoted
max cgroup value size with the other storages.

For percpu, the max is 32k (PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE) because percpu
allocator is not happy about larger values.

netcnt test is extended to exercise those maximum values
(non-percpu max size is close to, but not real max).

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <redacted>
---
 kernel/bpf/local_storage.c                    | 12 +++++-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/netcnt_common.h   | 38 +++++++++++++++----
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netcnt_prog.c | 29 +++++++-------
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_netcnt.c     | 25 +++++++-----
 4 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
index 7ed2a14dc0de..a276da74c20a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 //SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 #include <linux/bpf-cgroup.h>
 #include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <linux/bpf_local_storage.h>
 #include <linux/btf.h>
 #include <linux/bug.h>
 #include <linux/filter.h>
@@ -284,8 +285,17 @@ static int cgroup_storage_get_next_key(struct  
bpf_map *_map, void *key,
quoted
 static struct bpf_map *cgroup_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
 	int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
+	__u32 max_value_size = PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE;
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map;

+	/* percpu is bound by PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE, non-percu
+	 * is the same as other local storages.
+	 */
+	if (attr->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_CGROUP_STORAGE)
+		max_value_size = BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_MAX_VALUE_SIZE;
+
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE > BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_MAX_VALUE_SIZE);
If PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE did become larger, I assume it would be bounded by
BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_MAX_VALUE_SIZE again?
Instead of BUILD_BUG_ON, how about a min_t here:
	if (attr->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_CGROUP_STORAGE)
		max_value_size = min_t(__u32,
					BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_MAX_VALUE_SIZE,
					PCPU_MIN_UNIT_SIZE);
Sounds like a much better idea, thanks, will incorporate into v2.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help