Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/3] libbpf: btf typed data dumping fixes (__int128 usage, error propagation)
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
Date: 2021-07-20 21:05:51
Also in:
bpf
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
Date: 2021-07-20 21:05:51
Also in:
bpf
Hello: This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master): On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:49:50 +0100 you wrote:
This series aims to resolve further issues with the BTF typed data dumping interfaces in libbpf. Compilation failures with use of __int128 on 32-bit platforms were reported [1]. As a result, the use of __int128 in libbpf typed data dumping is replaced with __u64 usage for bitfield manipulations. In the case of 128-bit integer values, they are simply split into two 64-bit hex values for display (patch 1). [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v2,bpf-next,1/3] libbpf: avoid use of __int128 in typed dump display
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a1d3cc3c5eca
- [v2,bpf-next,2/3] selftests/bpf: add __int128-specific tests for typed data dump
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a17553dde294
- [v2,bpf-next,3/3] libbpf: propagate errors when retrieving enum value for typed data display
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/720c29fca9fb
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html