Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2021-07-20

Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/3] libbpf: btf typed data dumping fixes (__int128 usage, error propagation)

From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
Date: 2021-07-20 21:05:51
Also in: bpf

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 09:49:50 +0100 you wrote:
This series aims to resolve further issues with the BTF typed data
dumping interfaces in libbpf.

Compilation failures with use of __int128 on 32-bit platforms were
reported [1].  As a result, the use of __int128 in libbpf typed data
dumping is replaced with __u64 usage for bitfield manipulations.
In the case of 128-bit integer values, they are simply split into
two 64-bit hex values for display (patch 1).

[...]
Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2,bpf-next,1/3] libbpf: avoid use of __int128 in typed dump display
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a1d3cc3c5eca
  - [v2,bpf-next,2/3] selftests/bpf: add __int128-specific tests for typed data dump
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/a17553dde294
  - [v2,bpf-next,3/3] libbpf: propagate errors when retrieving enum value for typed data display
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/720c29fca9fb

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help