On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 5:00 PM Andrii Nakryiko
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+ }
+ /* allocate hrtimer via map_kmalloc to use memcg accounting */
+ t = bpf_map_kmalloc_node(map, sizeof(*t), GFP_ATOMIC, NUMA_NO_NODE);
I wonder if it would make sense to use map->numa_node here to keep map
value and timer data in the same NUMA node?
quoted
+ if (!t) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto out;
+ }
[...]
quoted
+
+/* This function is called by map_delete/update_elem for individual element.
+ * By ops->map_release_uref when the user space reference to a map reaches zero
+ * and by ops->map_free when the kernel reference reaches zero.
is ops->map_free part still valid?
Both good points. Will respin.