Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 2 authors, 2021-07-29

Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 1/5] RDMA/mlx5: Replace struct mlx5_core_mkey by u32 key

flat view

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Date: 2021-07-29 18:09:02
Also in: linux-rdma, lkml

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 03:08:19PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
index 03dc6c22843f..ae0472d92801 100644
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
@@ -89,24 +89,39 @@ static void set_mkc_access_pd_addr_fields(void *mkc, int acc, u64 start_addr,
 	MLX5_SET64(mkc, mkc, start_addr, start_addr);
 }
 
-static void
-assign_mkey_variant(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, struct mlx5_core_mkey *mkey,
-		    u32 *in)
+static void assign_mkey_variant(struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev, u32 *mkey, u32 *in)
 {
 	u8 key = atomic_inc_return(&dev->mkey_var);
 	void *mkc;
 
 	mkc = MLX5_ADDR_OF(create_mkey_in, in, memory_key_mkey_entry);
 	MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, mkey_7_0, key);
-	mkey->key = key;
+	*mkey = key;
+}
Can this be tidied please? We set both mkey_7_0 and mkey then pass
them into mlx5_core_create_mkey which then does

	*mkey = (u32)mlx5_mkey_variant(*mkey) | mlx5_idx_to_mkey(mkey_index);

But isn't mlx5_mkey_variant(*mkey) just MLX5_GET(mkc, in, mkey_7_0)
and we can get rid of this confusing sequence?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
+static void set_mkey_fields(void *mkc, struct mlx5_core_mkey *mkey)
+{
+	mkey->iova = MLX5_GET64(mkc, mkc, start_addr);
+	mkey->size = MLX5_GET64(mkc, mkc, len);
+	mkey->pd = MLX5_GET(mkc, mkc, pd);
+	init_waitqueue_head(&mkey->wait);
 }
Why isn't this called through the create_mkey_callback() path? I think
evey mkey should always have a valid waitqueue

Jason
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help