Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] devlink: Break parameter notification sequence to be before/after unload/load driver
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-07-29 12:11:36
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
networking [general], the rest · Maintainers:
"David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 01:57:01PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 01:35:55PM CEST, leon@kernel.org wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 01:22:58PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:quoted
Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 10:15:25AM CEST, leon@kernel.org wrote:quoted
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com><...>quoted
quoted
diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c index b596a971b473..54e2a0375539 100644 --- a/net/core/devlink.c +++ b/net/core/devlink.c@@ -3801,8 +3801,9 @@ static void devlink_param_notify(struct devlink *devlink,struct devlink_param_item *param_item, enum devlink_command cmd); -static void devlink_reload_netns_change(struct devlink *devlink, - struct net *dest_net) +static void devlink_params_notify(struct devlink *devlink, struct net *dest_net,Please name it differently. This function notifies not only the params, but the devlink instance itself as well.I'm open for suggestion. What did you have in mind?devlink_ns_change_notify?
NP, will change
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ struct net *curr_net, + enum devlink_command cmd) { struct devlink_param_item *param_item;@@ -3812,17 +3813,17 @@ static void devlink_reload_netns_change(struct devlink *devlink,* reload process so the notifications are generated separatelly. */ - list_for_each_entry(param_item, &devlink->param_list, list) - devlink_param_notify(devlink, 0, param_item, - DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_DEL); - devlink_notify(devlink, DEVLINK_CMD_DEL); + if (!dest_net || net_eq(dest_net, curr_net)) + return; - __devlink_net_set(devlink, dest_net); + if (cmd == DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_NEW) + devlink_notify(devlink, DEVLINK_CMD_NEW);This is quite odd. According to PARAMS cmd you decife devlink CMD. Just have bool arg which would help you select both DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_NEW/DEL and DEVLINK_CMD_NEW/DELThe patch is quite misleading, but the final result looks neat: 3847 static void devlink_params_notify(struct devlink *devlink, struct net *dest_net, 3848 struct net *curr_net, 3849 enum devlink_command cmd) 3850 { 3851 struct devlink_param_item *param_item; 3852 3853 /* Userspace needs to be notified about devlink objects 3854 * removed from original and entering new network namespace. 3855 * The rest of the devlink objects are re-created during 3856 * reload process so the notifications are generated separatelly. 3857 */ 3858 3859 if (!dest_net || net_eq(dest_net, curr_net)) 3860 return; 3861 3862 if (cmd == DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_NEW) 3863 devlink_notify(devlink, DEVLINK_CMD_NEW);Nothing misleading here. This is exactly what I'm pointing out...
Do you ask for this change?
diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index 077310c26a8b..ee7204787b29 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c@@ -3846,7 +3846,7 @@ static void devlink_param_notify(struct devlink *devlink, static void devlink_params_notify(struct devlink *devlink, struct net *dest_net, struct net *curr_net, - enum devlink_command cmd) + enum devlink_command cmd, bool new) { struct devlink_param_item *param_item;
@@ -3859,13 +3859,13 @@ static void devlink_params_notify(struct devlink *devlink, struct net *dest_net, if (!dest_net || net_eq(dest_net, curr_net)) return; - if (cmd == DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_NEW) + if (new) devlink_notify(devlink, DEVLINK_CMD_NEW); list_for_each_entry(param_item, &devlink->param_list, list) devlink_param_notify(devlink, 0, param_item, cmd); - if (cmd == DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_DEL) + if (!new) devlink_notify(devlink, DEVLINK_CMD_DEL); }
@@ -3957,7 +3957,7 @@ static int devlink_reload(struct devlink *devlink, struct net *dest_net, curr_net = devlink_net(devlink); devlink_params_notify(devlink, dest_net, curr_net, - DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_DEL); + DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_DEL, false); err = devlink->ops->reload_down(devlink, !!dest_net, action, limit, extack); if (err) return err;
@@ -3971,7 +3971,7 @@ static int devlink_reload(struct devlink *devlink, struct net *dest_net, return err; devlink_params_notify(devlink, dest_net, curr_net, - DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_NEW); + DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_NEW, true); WARN_ON(!(*actions_performed & BIT(action))); /* Catch driver on updating the remote action within devlink reload */ WARN_ON(memcmp(remote_reload_stats, devlink->stats.remote_reload_stats,
quoted
3864 3865 list_for_each_entry(param_item, &devlink->param_list, list) 3866 devlink_param_notify(devlink, 0, param_item, cmd); 3867 3868 if (cmd == DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_DEL) 3869 devlink_notify(devlink, DEVLINK_CMD_DEL); 3870 } So as you can see in line 3866, we anyway will need to provide "cmd", so do you suggest to add extra two bool variables to the function signature to avoid "cmd == DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_NEW" and "cmd == DEVLINK_CMD_PARAM_DEL" ifs? Thanks