Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 2 authors, 2021-07-20
STALE1811d
Revisions (2)
  1. v1 current
  2. v2 [diff vs current]

[PATCH bpf-next 0/3] libbpf: btf typed data dumping fixes (__int128 usage, error propagation)

From: Alan Maguire <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-19 22:23:45
Also in: bpf, linux-kselftest, lkml

This series aims to resolve further issues with the BTF typed data
dumping interfaces in libbpf.

Compilation failures with use of __int128 on 32-bit platforms were
reported [1].  As a result, the use of __int128 in libbpf typed data
dumping is replaced with __u64 usage for bitfield manipulations.
In the case of 128-bit integer values, they are simply split into
two 64-bit hex values for display (patch 1).

Tests are added for __int128 display in patch 2, using conditional
compilation to avoid problems with a lack of __int128 support.

Patch 3 resolves an issue Andrii noted about error propagation
when handling enum data display.

More followup work is required to ensure multi-dimensional char array
display works correctly.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1626362126-27775-1-git-send-email-alan.maguire@oracle.com/T/#mc2cb023acfd6c3cd0b661e385787b76bb757430d (local)

Alan Maguire (3):
  libbpf: avoid use of __int128 in typed dump display
  selftests/bpf: add __int128-specific tests for typed data dump
  libbpf: propagate errors when retrieving enum value for typed data
    display

 tools/lib/bpf/btf_dump.c                          | 67 +++++++++++++----------
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c | 17 ++++++
 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.3.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help