Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] genirq: Cleanup the usage of irq_set_affinity_hint
From: Nitesh Lal <hidden>
Date: 2021-07-13 13:29:54
Also in:
linux-api, linux-pci, linux-scsi, lkml
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 1:01 AM Leon Romanovsky [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 05:27:05PM -0400, Nitesh Lal wrote:quoted
Hi Leon,
<snip>
quoted
quoted
quoted
Gentle ping. Any comments or suggestions on any of the patches included in this series?Please wait for -rc1, rebase and resend. At least i40iw was deleted during merge window.In -rc1 some non-trivial mlx5 changes also went in. I was going through these changes and it seems after your patch e4e3f24b822f: ("net/mlx5: Provide cpumask at EQ creation phase") we do want to control the affinity for the mlx5 interrupts from the driver. Is that correct?We would like to create devices with correct affinity from the beginning. For this, we will introduce extension to devlink to control affinity that will be used prior initialization sequence. Currently, netdev users who don't want irqbalance are digging into their procfs, reconfigure affinity on already existing devices and hope for the best. This is even more cumbersome for the SIOV use case, where every physical NIC PCI device will/can create thousands of lightweights netdevs that will be forwarded to the containers later. These containers are limited to known CPU cores, so no reason do not limit netdev device too. The same goes for other sub-functions of that PCI device, like RDMA, vdpa e.t.c.quoted
This would mean that we should use irq_set_affinity_and_hint() instead of irq_update_affinity_hint().I think so.
Thanks, will make that change in the patch and re-send. I will also drop your reviewed-by for the mlx5 patch so that you can have a look at it again, please let me know if you have any objections. -- Thanks Nitesh