Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 3 authors, 2021-07-14

Re: [PATCH] replace for loop with array initializer

From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Date: 2021-07-12 20:05:26
Also in: lkml

On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 20:24:50 +0100
Salah Triki [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/farsync.c b/drivers/net/wan/farsync.c
index b3466e084e84..a90d3b9a8170 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/farsync.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/farsync.c
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ static void fst_process_int_work_q(struct tasklet_struct *unused);
 static DECLARE_TASKLET(fst_tx_task, fst_process_tx_work_q);
 static DECLARE_TASKLET(fst_int_task, fst_process_int_work_q);
 
-static struct fst_card_info *fst_card_array[FST_MAX_CARDS];
+static struct fst_card_info *fst_card_array[FST_MAX_CARDS] = { [0 ... FST_MAX_CARDS-1] = NULL };
Why bother, the default initialization in C is 0 (ie. NULL).
In fact, checkpatch should complain about useless array initialization for this.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help