Thread (23 messages) flat view 23 messages, 5 authors, 2021-07-13

Re: [PATCH 1/3] sfc: revert "reduce the number of requested xdp ev queues"

From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-07-09 14:07:39
Also in: lkml

On 08/07/2021 13:14, Íñigo Huguet wrote:
In my opinion, there is no reason to make that distinction between
normal traffic and XDP traffic.
[...]
If the user wants to prevent XDP from mixing with normal traffic, just
not attaching an XDP program to the interface, or not using
XDP_TX/REDIRECT in it would be enough. Probably I don't understand
what you want to say here.
I think it's less about that and more about avoiding lock contention.
If two sources (XDP and the regular stack) are both trying to use a TXQ,
 and contending for a lock, it's possible that the resulting total
 throughput could be far less than either source alone would get if it
 had exclusive use of a queue.
There don't really seem to be any good answers to this; any CPU in the
 system can initiate an XDP_REDIRECT at any time and if they can't each
 get a queue to themselves then I don't see how the arbitration can be
 performant.  (There is the middle-ground possibility of TXQs shared by
 multiple XDP CPUs but not shared with the regular stack, in which case
 if only a subset of CPUs are actually handling RX on the device(s) with
 an XDP_REDIRECTing program it may be possible to avoid contention if
 the core-to-XDP-TXQ mapping can be carefully configured.)

-ed
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help