Re: [bpf-next 3/3] bpf: Fix a use after free in bpf_check()
From: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-07-07 07:25:40
Also in:
bpf, lkml
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 8:53 PM He Fengqing [off-list ref] wrote:
In bpf_patch_insn_data, env->prog was input parameter of bpf_patch_insn_single function. bpf_patch_insn_single call bpf_prog_realloc to realloc ebpf prog. When we need to malloc new prog, bpf_prog_realloc will free the old prog, in this scenery is the env->prog. Then bpf_patch_insn_data function call adjust_insn_aux_data function, if adjust_insn_aux_data function return error, bpf_patch_insn_data will return NULL. In bpf_check->convert_ctx_accesses->bpf_patch_insn_data call chain, if bpf_patch_insn_data return NULL, env->prog has been freed in bpf_prog_realloc, then bpf_check will use the freed env->prog.
Besides "what is the bug", please also describe "how to fix it". For example, add "Fix it by adding a free_old argument to bpf_prog_realloc(), and ...". Also, for the subject of 0/3, it is better to say "fix potential memory leak and ...".
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: He Fengqing <redacted> --- include/linux/filter.h | 2 +- kernel/bpf/core.c | 9 ++++--- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- net/core/filter.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h index f39e008a377d..ec11a5ae92c2 100644 --- a/include/linux/filter.h +++ b/include/linux/filter.h@@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ void bpf_prog_jit_attempt_done(struct bpf_prog *prog); struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_alloc(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_extra_flags); struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_alloc_no_stats(unsigned int size, gfp_t gfp_extra_flags); struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_realloc(struct bpf_prog *fp_old, unsigned int size, - gfp_t gfp_extra_flags); + gfp_t gfp_extra_flags, bool free_old); void __bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *fp); static inline void bpf_prog_clone_free(struct bpf_prog *fp)diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index 49b0311f48c1..e5616bb1665b 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ void bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(struct bpf_prog *prog, } struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_realloc(struct bpf_prog *fp_old, unsigned int size, - gfp_t gfp_extra_flags) + gfp_t gfp_extra_flags, bool free_old) { gfp_t gfp_flags = GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO | gfp_extra_flags; struct bpf_prog *fp;@@ -238,7 +238,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_realloc(struct bpf_prog *fp_old, unsigned int size, /* We keep fp->aux from fp_old around in the new * reallocated structure. */ - bpf_prog_clone_free(fp_old); + if (free_old) + bpf_prog_clone_free(fp_old); } return fp;@@ -456,7 +457,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_single(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off, * last page could have large enough tailroom. */ prog_adj = bpf_prog_realloc(prog, bpf_prog_size(insn_adj_cnt), - GFP_USER); + GFP_USER, false); if (!prog_adj) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);@@ -1150,6 +1151,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_jit_blind_constants(struct bpf_prog *prog) return tmp; } + if (tmp != clone) + bpf_prog_clone_free(clone); clone = tmp; insn_delta = rewritten - 1;diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 41109f49b724..e75b933f69e4 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c@@ -11855,7 +11855,10 @@ static int opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, adj_idx, patch, patch_len); if (!new_prog) return -ENOMEM; - env->prog = new_prog; + if (new_prog != env->prog) { + bpf_prog_clone_free(env->prog); + env->prog = new_prog; + }
Can we move this check into bpf_patch_insn_data()?
insns = new_prog->insnsi;
aux = env->insn_aux_data;
delta += patch_len - 1;[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c index d70187ce851b..8a8d1a3ba5c2 100644 --- a/net/core/filter.c +++ b/net/core/filter.c@@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_migrate_filter(struct bpf_prog *fp) /* Expand fp for appending the new filter representation. */ old_fp = fp; - fp = bpf_prog_realloc(old_fp, bpf_prog_size(new_len), 0); + fp = bpf_prog_realloc(old_fp, bpf_prog_size(new_len), 0, true);
Can we add some logic here and not add free_old to bpf_prog_realloc()? Thanks, Song