Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 04/10] net: bridge: switchdev: allow the data plane forwarding to be offloaded
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Date: 2021-07-09 13:16:44
On 03/07/2021 14:56, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
From: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> Allow switchdevs to forward frames from the CPU in accordance with the bridge configuration in the same way as is done between bridge ports. This means that the bridge will only send a single skb towards one of the ports under the switchdev's control, and expects the driver to deliver the packet to all eligible ports in its domain. Primarily this improves the performance of multicast flows with multiple subscribers, as it allows the hardware to perform the frame replication. The basic flow between the driver and the bridge is as follows: - The switchdev accepts the offload by returning a non-null pointer from .ndo_dfwd_add_station when the port is added to the bridge. - The bridge sends offloadable skbs to one of the ports under the switchdev's control using dev_queue_xmit_accel. - The switchdev notices the offload by checking for a non-NULL "sb_dev" in the core's call to .ndo_select_queue.
Sry, I could be missing smth. Is there any possibility to just mark skb itself as "fwd_offload" (or smth), so driver can just check it and decide what to do. Following you series: - BR itself will send packet only once to one port if fwd offload possible and supported - switchdev driver can check/negotiate BR_FWD_OFFLOAD flag In our case, TI CPSW can send directed packet (default now), by specifying port_id if DMA desc or keep port_id == 0 which will allow HW to process packet internally, including MC duplication. Sry, again, but necessity to add 3 callbacks and manipulate with "virtual" queue to achieve MC offload (seems like one of the primary goals) from BR itself looks a bit over-complicated :(
v1->v2: - convert br_input_skb_cb::fwd_hwdoms to a plain unsigned long - introduce a static key "br_switchdev_fwd_offload_used" to minimize the impact of the newly introduced feature on all the setups which don't have hardware that can make use of it - introduce a check for nbp->flags & BR_FWD_OFFLOAD to optimize cache line access - reorder nbp_switchdev_frame_mark_accel() and br_handle_vlan() in __br_forward() - do not strip VLAN on egress if forwarding offload on VLAN-aware bridge is being used - propagate errors from .ndo_dfwd_add_station() if not EOPNOTSUPP Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> --- include/linux/if_bridge.h | 1 + net/bridge/br_forward.c | 18 +++++++- net/bridge/br_private.h | 24 +++++++++++ net/bridge/br_switchdev.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
[...] -- Best regards, grygorii