Re: [PATCH v9 bpf-next 01/14] net: skbuff: add data_len field to skb_shared_info
flat view
From: Alexander Duyck <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-29 20:45:22
Also in:
bpf
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 12:18 PM Lorenzo Bianconi [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 29/06/2021 20.37, Jakub Kicinski wrote:quoted
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021 11:18:38 -0700 Alexander Duyck wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 10:08 AM Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
ack, I agree. I will fix it in v10.Why is XDP mb incompatible with LRO? I thought that was one of the use cases (mentioned by Willem IIRC).XDP is meant to be a per packet operation with support for TX and REDIRECT, and LRO isn't routable. So we could put together a large LRO frame but we wouldn't be able to break it apart again. If we allow that then we are going to need a ton more exception handling added to the XDP paths. As far as GSO it would require setting many more fields in order to actually make it offloadable by any hardware.It would require more work, but TSO seems to be explicitly stated as what the series builds towards (in the cover letter). It's fine to make choices we'd need to redo later, I guess, I'm just trying to understand the why.This is also my understanding that LRO and TSO is what this patchset is working towards. Sorry, I don't agree or understand this requested change.My understanding here is to use gso_size to store paged length of the xdp multi-buffer. When converting the xdp_frame to a skb we will need to overwrite it to support gro/lro. Is my understanding correct?
Yes, I was thinking just of the xdp_buff, not the xdp_frame. My focus for right now is mostly around the Rx side of things, xdp_buff to skb, and around the XDP_TX path. If we want to drop/move where we keep the data length when doing the conversion I would be fine with that.