Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 2 authors, 2021-06-24
STALE1827d LANDED
Revisions (2)
  1. v4 [diff vs current]
  2. v5 current

[PATCH bpf-next v5 15/19] qede: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation

From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-24 16:13:59
Also in: bpf
Subsystem: networking drivers, qlogic ql4xxx ethernet driver, the rest · Maintainers: Andrew Lunn, "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds

The qede driver has rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pairs around XDP
program invocations. However, the actual lifetime of the objects referred
by the XDP program invocation is longer, all the way through to the call to
xdp_do_flush(), making the scope of the rcu_read_lock() too small. This
turns out to be harmless because it all happens in a single NAPI poll
cycle (and thus under local_bh_disable()), but it makes the rcu_read_lock()
misleading.

Rather than extend the scope of the rcu_read_lock(), just get rid of it
entirely. With the addition of RCU annotations to the XDP_REDIRECT map
types that take bh execution into account, lockdep even understands this to
be safe, so there's really no reason to keep it around.

Cc: Ariel Elior <redacted>
Cc: GR-everest-linux-l2@marvell.com
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <redacted>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_fp.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_fp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_fp.c
index 8e150dd4f899..065e9004598e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_fp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_fp.c
@@ -1089,13 +1089,7 @@ static bool qede_rx_xdp(struct qede_dev *edev,
 	xdp_prepare_buff(&xdp, page_address(bd->data), *data_offset,
 			 *len, false);
 
-	/* Queues always have a full reset currently, so for the time
-	 * being until there's atomic program replace just mark read
-	 * side for map helpers.
-	 */
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(prog, &xdp);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	/* Recalculate, as XDP might have changed the headers */
 	*data_offset = xdp.data - xdp.data_hard_start;
-- 
2.32.0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help