Thread (22 messages) flat view 22 messages, 2 authors, 2021-06-24

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/19] xdp: add proper __rcu annotations to redirect map entries

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2021-06-24 13:12:41
Also in: bpf

On 6/23/21 1:07 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
XDP_REDIRECT works by a three-step process: the bpf_redirect() and
bpf_redirect_map() helpers will lookup the target of the redirect and store
it (along with some other metadata) in a per-CPU struct bpf_redirect_info.
Next, when the program returns the XDP_REDIRECT return code, the driver
will call xdp_do_redirect() which will use the information thus stored to
actually enqueue the frame into a bulk queue structure (that differs
slightly by map type, but shares the same principle). Finally, before
exiting its NAPI poll loop, the driver will call xdp_do_flush(), which will
flush all the different bulk queues, thus completing the redirect.
[...]
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <redacted>
[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index c5ad7df029ed..b01e266dad9e 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -762,12 +762,10 @@ DECLARE_BPF_DISPATCHER(xdp)
  
  static __always_inline u32 bpf_prog_run_xdp(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
  					    struct xdp_buff *xdp)
-{
-	/* Caller needs to hold rcu_read_lock() (!), otherwise program
-	 * can be released while still running, or map elements could be
-	 * freed early while still having concurrent users. XDP fastpath
-	 * already takes rcu_read_lock() when fetching the program, so
-	 * it's not necessary here anymore.
+
+	/* Driver XDP hooks are invoked within a single NAPI poll cycle and thus
+	 * under local_bh_disable(), which provides the needed RCU protection
+	 * for accessing map entries.
  	 */
  	return __BPF_PROG_RUN(prog, xdp, BPF_DISPATCHER_FUNC(xdp));
  }
I just went over the series to manually fix up merge conflicts in the driver
patches since they didn't apply cleanly against bpf-next.

But as it turned out that extra work was needless, since you didn't even compile
test the series before submission, sigh.

Please fix (and only submit compile- & runtime-tested code in future).

Thanks,
Daniel
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help