Re: [PATCH bpf 2/2] bpf: selftest to verify mixing bpf2bpf calls and tailcalls with insn patch
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-06-09 16:26:21
Also in:
bpf
Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 12:30:33PM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:quoted
This adds some extra noise to the tailcall_bpf2bpf4 tests that will cause verifier to patch insns. This then moves around subprog start/end insn index and poke descriptor insn index to ensure that verify and JIT will continue to track these correctly.This test is the most complicated one where I tried to document the scope of it on the side of prog_tests/tailcalls.c. I feel that it would make it more difficult to debug it if under any circumstances something would have been broken with that logic. Maybe a separate test scenario? Or is this an overkill? If so, I would vote for moving it to tailcall_bpf2bpf1.c and have a little comment that testing other bpf helpers mixed in is in scope of that test.
I like pushing it into the complex test to get the most instruction patching combinations possible.
quoted
Reviewed-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> --- .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c index 9a1b166b7fbe..0d70de5f97e2 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c@@ -2,6 +2,13 @@ #include <linux/bpf.h> #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> +struct { + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY); + __uint(max_entries, 1); + __uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32)); + __uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32)); +} nop_table SEC(".maps"); + struct { __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY); __uint(max_entries, 3);@@ -11,9 +18,19 @@ struct { static volatile int count; +__noinline +int subprog_noise(struct __sk_buff *skb) +{ + __u32 key = 0; + + bpf_map_lookup_elem(&nop_table, &key); + return 0; +} + __noinline int subprog_tail_2(struct __sk_buff *skb) { + subprog_noise(skb); bpf_tail_call_static(skb, &jmp_table, 2); return skb->len * 3; }