Re: [PATCH 13/19] bpf: Add support to link multi func tracing program
From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-08 18:54:22
Also in:
bpf
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 08:17:00PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 08:42:32AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:quoted
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 4:11 AM Jiri Olsa [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Adding support to attach multiple functions to tracing program by using the link_create/link_update interface. Adding multi_btf_ids/multi_btf_ids_cnt pair to link_create struct API, that define array of functions btf ids that will be attached to prog_fd. The prog_fd needs to be multi prog tracing program (BPF_F_MULTI_FUNC). The new link_create interface creates new BPF_LINK_TYPE_TRACING_MULTI link type, which creates separate bpf_trampoline and registers it as direct function for all specified btf ids. The new bpf_trampoline is out of scope (bpf_trampoline_lookup) of standard trampolines, so all registered functions need to be free of direct functions, otherwise the link fails.Overall the api makes sense to me. The restriction of multi vs non-multi is too severe though. The multi trampoline can serve normal fentry/fexit too.so multi trampoline gets called from all the registered functions, so there would need to be filter for specific ip before calling the standard program.. single cmp/jnz might not be that bad, I'll check
You mean reusing the same multi trampoline for all IPs and regenerating it with a bunch of cmp/jnz checks? There should be a better way to scale. Maybe clone multi trampoline instead? IPs[1-10] will point to multi. IP[11] will point to a clone of multi that serves multi prog and fentry/fexit progs specific for that IP.