Thread (76 messages) flat view 76 messages, 6 authors, 2021-07-07

Re: [PATCH 13/19] bpf: Add support to link multi func tracing program

From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-08 18:54:22
Also in: bpf

On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 08:17:00PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 08:42:32AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
quoted
On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 4:11 AM Jiri Olsa [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Adding support to attach multiple functions to tracing program
by using the link_create/link_update interface.

Adding multi_btf_ids/multi_btf_ids_cnt pair to link_create struct
API, that define array of functions btf ids that will be attached
to prog_fd.

The prog_fd needs to be multi prog tracing program (BPF_F_MULTI_FUNC).

The new link_create interface creates new BPF_LINK_TYPE_TRACING_MULTI
link type, which creates separate bpf_trampoline and registers it
as direct function for all specified btf ids.

The new bpf_trampoline is out of scope (bpf_trampoline_lookup) of
standard trampolines, so all registered functions need to be free
of direct functions, otherwise the link fails.
Overall the api makes sense to me.
The restriction of multi vs non-multi is too severe though.
The multi trampoline can serve normal fentry/fexit too.
so multi trampoline gets called from all the registered functions,
so there would need to be filter for specific ip before calling the
standard program.. single cmp/jnz might not be that bad, I'll check
You mean reusing the same multi trampoline for all IPs and regenerating
it with a bunch of cmp/jnz checks? There should be a better way to scale.
Maybe clone multi trampoline instead?
IPs[1-10] will point to multi.
IP[11] will point to a clone of multi that serves multi prog and
fentry/fexit progs specific for that IP.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help