Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 06/11] libbpf: add BPF static linker APIs
flat view
From: Tom Stellard <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-08 02:41:58
Also in:
bpf
On 6/7/21 5:25 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 4:12 PM Tom Stellard [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi,quoted
+ } else { + pr_warn("relocation against STT_SECTION in non-exec section is not supported!\n"); + return -EINVAL; + }Kernel build of commit 324c92e5e0ee are failing for me with this error message: /builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-5.13-rc4-61-g324c92e5e0ee/linux-5.13.0-0.rc4.20210603git324c92e5e0ee.35.fc35.x86_64/tools/bpf/bpftool/bpftool gen object /builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-5.13-rc4-61-g324c92e5e0ee/linux-5.13.0-0.rc4.20210603git324c92e5e0ee.35.fc35.x86_64/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bind_perm.linked1.o /builddir/build/BUILD/kernel-5.13-rc4-61-g324c92e5e0ee/linux-5.13.0-0.rc4.20210603git324c92e5e0ee.35.fc35.x86_64/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bind_perm.o libbpf: relocation against STT_SECTION in non-exec section is not supported! What information can I provide to help debug this failure?Can you please send that bind_perm.o file? Also what's your `clang --version` output?
clang version 12.0.0 (Fedora 12.0.0-2.fc35)
quoted
I suspect this might be due to Clang commit 6a2ea84600ba ("BPF: Add more relocation kinds"), but I get a different error on 324c92e5e0ee. So meanwhile you might try applying 9f0c317f6aa1 ("libbpf: Add support for new llvm bpf relocations") from bpf-next/master and check if that helps. But please do share bind_perm.o, just to double-check what's going on.
Here is bind_perm.o: https://fedorapeople.org/~tstellar/bind_perm.o Thanks, Tom
quoted
quoted
Thanks, Tom