Re: [PATCH v8 09/10] vduse: Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in Userspace
From: Jason Wang <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-29 04:03:52
Also in:
kvm, linux-fsdevel, linux-iommu, lkml, virtualization
在 2021/6/29 上午11:56, Yongji Xie 写道:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:29 AM Jason Wang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
在 2021/6/29 上午10:26, Yongji Xie 写道:quoted
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 12:40 PM Jason Wang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
在 2021/6/25 下午12:19, Yongji Xie 写道:quoted
quoted
2b) for set_status(): simply relay the message to userspace, reply is no needed. Userspace will use a command to update the status when the datapath is stop. The the status could be fetched via get_stats(). 2b looks more spec complaint.Looks good to me. And I think we can use the reply of the message to update the status instead of introducing a new command.Just notice this part in virtio_finalize_features(): virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FEATURES_OK); status = dev->config->get_status(dev); if (!(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FEATURES_OK)) { So we no reply doesn't work for FEATURES_OK. So my understanding is: 1) We must not use noreply for set_status() 2) We can use noreply for get_status(), but it requires a new ioctl to update the status. So it looks to me we need synchronize for both get_status() and set_status().We should not send messages to userspace in the FEATURES_OK case. So the synchronization is not necessary.As discussed previously, there could be a device that mandates some features (VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED). So it can choose to not accept FEATURES_OK is packed virtqueue is not negotiated. In this case we need to relay the message to userspace.OK, I see. If so, I prefer to only use noreply for set_status(). We do not set the status bit if the message is failed. In this way, we don't need to change lots of virtio core codes to handle the failure of set_status()/get_status().
It should work. Thanks
Thanks, Yongji