Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2021-07-05
STALE1830d LANDED

[PATCH bpf] samples/bpf: Fix xdpsock with '-M' parameter missing unload process

From: Wang Hai <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-28 09:19:25
Also in: bpf, lkml
Subsystem: bpf [general] (safe dynamic programs and tools), the rest, xdp (express data path) · Maintainers: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Linus Torvalds, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski, Jesper Dangaard Brouer, John Fastabend

Execute the following command and exit, then execute it again, the
following error will be reported.

$ sudo ./samples/bpf/xdpsock -i ens4f2 -M
^C
$ sudo ./samples/bpf/xdpsock -i ens4f2 -M
libbpf: elf: skipping unrecognized data section(16) .eh_frame
libbpf: elf: skipping relo section(17) .rel.eh_frame for section(16) .eh_frame
libbpf: Kernel error message: XDP program already attached
ERROR: link set xdp fd failed

commit c9d27c9e8dc7 ("samples: bpf: Do not unload prog within xdpsock")
removed the unload prog code because of the presence of bpf_link. This
is fine if XDP_SHARED_UMEM is disable, but if it is enable, unload prog
is still needed.

Fixes: c9d27c9e8dc7 ("samples: bpf: Do not unload prog within xdpsock")
Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <redacted>
---
 samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
index 53e300f860bb..33d0bdebbed8 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ static int opt_xsk_frame_size = XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FRAME_SIZE;
 static int opt_timeout = 1000;
 static bool opt_need_wakeup = true;
 static u32 opt_num_xsks = 1;
+static u32 prog_id;
 static bool opt_busy_poll;
 static bool opt_reduced_cap;
 
@@ -461,6 +462,23 @@ static void *poller(void *arg)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static void remove_xdp_program(void)
+{
+	u32 curr_prog_id = 0;
+
+	if (bpf_get_link_xdp_id(opt_ifindex, &curr_prog_id, opt_xdp_flags)) {
+		printf("bpf_get_link_xdp_id failed\n");
+		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+	}
+
+	if (prog_id == curr_prog_id)
+		bpf_set_link_xdp_fd(opt_ifindex, -1, opt_xdp_flags);
+	else if (!curr_prog_id)
+		printf("couldn't find a prog id on a given interface\n");
+	else
+		printf("program on interface changed, not removing\n");
+}
+
 static void int_exit(int sig)
 {
 	benchmark_done = true;
@@ -471,6 +489,9 @@ static void __exit_with_error(int error, const char *file, const char *func,
 {
 	fprintf(stderr, "%s:%s:%i: errno: %d/\"%s\"\n", file, func,
 		line, error, strerror(error));
+
+	if (opt_num_xsks > 1)
+		remove_xdp_program();
 	exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
 }
 
@@ -490,6 +511,9 @@ static void xdpsock_cleanup(void)
 		if (write(sock, &cmd, sizeof(int)) < 0)
 			exit_with_error(errno);
 	}
+
+	if (opt_num_xsks > 1)
+		remove_xdp_program();
 }
 
 static void swap_mac_addresses(void *data)
@@ -857,6 +881,10 @@ static struct xsk_socket_info *xsk_configure_socket(struct xsk_umem_info *umem,
 	if (ret)
 		exit_with_error(-ret);
 
+	ret = bpf_get_link_xdp_id(opt_ifindex, &prog_id, opt_xdp_flags);
+	if (ret)
+		exit_with_error(-ret);
+
 	xsk->app_stats.rx_empty_polls = 0;
 	xsk->app_stats.fill_fail_polls = 0;
 	xsk->app_stats.copy_tx_sendtos = 0;
-- 
2.17.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help