Re: Suggestions on how to debug kernel crashes where printk and gdb both does not work
From: Pavel Skripkin <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-14 20:30:22
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 23:04:03 +0800 Dongliang Mu [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:47 PM Pavel Skripkin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 22:40:55 +0800 Dongliang Mu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 10:25 PM Pavel Skripkin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 22:19:10 +0800 Dongliang Mu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 9:34 PM Pavel Skripkin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 21:22:43 +0800 Dongliang Mu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Dear kernel developers, I was trying to debug the crash - memory leak in hwsim_add_one [1] recently. However, I encountered a disgusting issue: my breakpoint and printk/pr_alert in the functions that will be surely executed do not work. The stack trace is in the following. I wrote this email to ask for some suggestions on how to debug such cases? Thanks very much. Looking forward to your reply.Hi, Dongliang! This bug is not similar to others on the dashboard. I spent some time debugging it a week ago. The main problem here, that memory allocation happens in the boot time:quoted
[<ffffffff84359255>] kernel_init+0xc/0x1a7 init/main.c:1447Oh, nice catch. No wonder why my debugging does not work. :(quoted
and reproducer simply tries to free this data. You can use ftrace to look at it. Smth like this: $ echo 'hwsim_*' > $TRACE_DIR/set_ftrace_filterThanks for your suggestion. Do you have any conclusions about this case? If you have found out the root cause and start writing patches, I will turn my focus to other cases.No, I had some busy days and I have nothing about this bug for now. I've just traced the reproducer execution and that's all :) I guess, some error handling paths are broken, but Im not sureIn the beginning, I agreed with you. However, after I manually checked functions: hwsim_probe (initialization) and hwsim_remove (cleanup), then things may be different. The cleanup looks correct to me. I would like to debug but stuck with the debugging process. And there is another issue: the cleanup function also does not output anything or hit the breakpoint. I don't quite understand it since the cleanup is not at the boot time. Any idea?Output from ftrace (syzkaller repro): root@syzkaller:~# cat /sys/kernel/tracing/trace # tracer: function_graph # # CPU DURATION FUNCTION CALLS # | | | | | | | 1) | hwsim_del_radio_nl() { 1) | hwsim_del() { 1) | hwsim_edge_unsubscribe_me() { 1) ! 310.041 us | hwsim_free_edge(); 1) ! 665.221 us | } 1) * 52999.05 us | } 1) * 53035.38 us | } Cleanup function is not the case, I think :)It seems like I spot the incorrect cleanup function (hwsim_remove is the right one is in my mind). Let me learn how to use ftrace to log the executed functions and then discuss this case with you guys.
Hmmm, I think, there is a mess with lists.
I just want to share my debug results, I have no idea about the fix for
now.
In hwsim_probe() edge for phy->idx = 1 is allocated, then reproduces
sends a request to delete phy with idx == 0, so this check in
hwsim_edge_unsubscribe_me():
if (e->endpoint->idx == phy->idx) {
... clean up code ...
}
won't be passed and edge won't be freed (because it was allocated for
phy with idx == 1). Allocated edge for phy 1 becomes leaked after
hwsim_del(). I can't really see the code where phy with idx == 1 can
be deleted from list...
Maybe, it's kmemleak bug. Similar strange case was with this one
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=3a325b8389fc41c1bc94de0f4ac437ed13cce584.
I find it strange, that I could reach leaked pointers after kmemleak reported a
leak. Im not familiar with kmemleak internals and I might be wrong
With regards,
Pavel Skripkin