在 2021/6/14 0:22, Andrew Lunn 写道:
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 03:38:16PM +0800, Guangbin Huang wrote:
quoted
From: Peng Li <redacted>
Should not initialise statics to 0.
Signed-off-by: Peng Li <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang <redacted>
---
drivers/net/wan/z85230.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c b/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c
index 94ed9a2..f815bb5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/z85230.c
@@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ irqreturn_t z8530_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
struct z8530_dev *dev=dev_id;
u8 intr;
- static volatile int locker=0;
+ static int locker;
Is the volatile unneeded? Please document that in the commit message.
Andrew
.
Hi, Andrew:
When i create this patch, it will WARNING: Use of volatile is usually
wrong: see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst
According to the file in kernel:
Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst
the "volatile" type class should not be used.
So i remove "volatile" in this patch.
I will add the reason in commit log Next version.
Thanks.
Peng Li