Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] net: tipc: fix FB_MTU eat two pages and do some code cleanup
From: Menglong Dong <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-09 12:57:17
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jon Maloy [off-list ref] wrote:
On 6/9/21 6:32 AM, menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote:quoted
From: Menglong Dong <redacted> In the first patch, FB_MTU is redefined to make sure data size will not exceed PAGE_SIZE. Besides, I removed the alignment for buf_size in tipc_buf_acquire, because skb_alloc_fclone will do the alignment job. In the second patch, I removed align() in msg.c and replace it with ALIGN(). Menglong Dong (2): net: tipc: fix FB_MTU eat two pages net: tipc: replace align() with ALIGN in msg.c net/tipc/bcast.c | 2 +- net/tipc/msg.c | 31 ++++++++++++++----------------- net/tipc/msg.h | 3 ++- 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)NACK. You must have missed my last mail before you sent out this. We have to define a separate macro for bcast.c, since those buffers sometimes will need encryption. Sorry for the confusion.
No, no, I didn't miss your mail. I think it can make us clear about what and how
to do by sending the V2 patches.
So we can define two versions 'FB_MTU' for bcast.c and msg.c, such as CRYPTO_MTU
and NON_CRYPTO_MTU. And within tipc_buf_acquire(), we decide which version
BUF_HEADROOM to use by the data size? Such as:
int buf_size;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TIPC_CRYPTO) && size == NON_CRYPTO_MTU) {
buf_size = size + BUF_HEADROOM_non-crypto + BUF_TAILROOM_non-crypto;
} else {
buf_size = size + BUF_HEADROOM_crypto + BUF_TAILROOM_crypto;
}
Is this feeling?
(It's a little weird to check whether the data should be crypto by data size).
Thanks!
Menglong Dong