Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 2 authors, 2021-06-09

Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] net: tipc: fix FB_MTU eat two pages and do some code cleanup

From: Menglong Dong <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-09 12:57:17
Also in: lkml

On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 6:47 PM Jon Maloy [off-list ref] wrote:


On 6/9/21 6:32 AM, menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote:
quoted
From: Menglong Dong <redacted>

In the first patch, FB_MTU is redefined to make sure data size will not
exceed PAGE_SIZE. Besides, I removed the alignment for buf_size in
tipc_buf_acquire, because skb_alloc_fclone will do the alignment job.

In the second patch, I removed align() in msg.c and replace it with
ALIGN().




Menglong Dong (2):
   net: tipc: fix FB_MTU eat two pages
   net: tipc: replace align() with ALIGN in msg.c

  net/tipc/bcast.c |  2 +-
  net/tipc/msg.c   | 31 ++++++++++++++-----------------
  net/tipc/msg.h   |  3 ++-
  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
NACK.
You must have missed my last mail before you sent out this.  We have to
define a separate macro for bcast.c, since those buffers sometimes will
need encryption.
Sorry for the confusion.
No, no, I didn't miss your mail. I think it can make us clear about what and how
to do by sending the V2 patches.

So we can define two versions 'FB_MTU' for bcast.c and msg.c, such as CRYPTO_MTU
and NON_CRYPTO_MTU. And within tipc_buf_acquire(), we decide which version
BUF_HEADROOM to use by the data size? Such as:

int buf_size;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TIPC_CRYPTO) && size == NON_CRYPTO_MTU) {
    buf_size = size + BUF_HEADROOM_non-crypto + BUF_TAILROOM_non-crypto;
} else {
    buf_size = size + BUF_HEADROOM_crypto + BUF_TAILROOM_crypto;
}

Is this feeling?
(It's a little weird to check whether the data should be crypto by data size).

Thanks!
Menglong Dong
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help