答复: [PATCH net-next] sctp: sm_statefuns: Fix spelling mistakes
flat view
From: zhengyongjun <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-01 01:53:45
Also in:
linux-sctp, lkml
Thanks for your advice, I will fix it as you suggest and send patch v2 :) -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Xin Long [mailto:lucien.xin@gmail.com] 发送时间: 2021年6月1日 0:24 收件人: zhengyongjun [off-list ref] 抄送: Vlad Yasevich [off-list ref]; Neil Horman [off-list ref]; Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [off-list ref]; davem [off-list ref]; Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref]; linux-sctp @ vger . kernel . org [off-list ref]; network dev [off-list ref]; LKML [off-list ref] 主题: Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: sm_statefuns: Fix spelling mistakes On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 9:48 PM Zheng Yongjun [off-list ref] wrote:
Fix some spelling mistakes in comments: genereate ==> generate correclty ==> correctly boundries ==> boundaries failes ==> fails
I believe more mistakes below in this file could hitchhike this patch to get fixed. :-) isses -> issues assocition -> association signe -> sign assocaition -> association managemement-> management restransmissions->retransmission sideffect -> sideeffect bomming -> booming chukns-> chunks SHUDOWN -> SHUTDOWN violationg->violating explcitly-> explicitly CHunk-> Chunk Thanks.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <redacted> --- net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c indexfd1e319eda00..68e7d14c3799 100644--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c +++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_do_5_1C_ack(struct net *net, sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_NEW_STATE, SCTP_STATE(SCTP_STATE_COOKIE_ECHOED)); - /* SCTP-AUTH: genereate the assocition shared keys so that + /* SCTP-AUTH: generate the assocition shared keys so that * we can potentially signe the COOKIE-ECHO. */ sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_ASSOC_SHKEY, SCTP_NULL());@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_do_5_1D_ce(structnet *net, /* Add all the state machine commands now since we've created * everything. This way we don't introduce memory corruptions - * during side-effect processing and correclty count established + * during side-effect processing and correctly count + established * associations. */ sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_NEW_ASOC, SCTP_ASOC(new_asoc)); @@ -2950,7 +2950,7 @@ enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_do_9_2_reshutack( commands); /* Since we are not going to really process this INIT, there - * is no point in verifying chunk boundries. Just generate + * is no point in verifying chunk boundaries. Just generate * the SHUTDOWN ACK. */ reply = sctp_make_shutdown_ack(asoc, chunk); @@ -3560,7 +3560,7 @@ enum sctp_disposition sctp_sf_do_9_2_final(struct net *net, goto nomem_chunk; /* Do all the commands now (after allocation), so that we - * have consistent state if memory allocation failes + * have consistent state if memory allocation fails */ sctp_add_cmd_sf(commands, SCTP_CMD_EVENT_ULP, SCTP_ULPEVENT(ev)); -- 2.25.1