Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: ip: avoid OOM kills with large UDP sends over loopback
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-06-24 02:24:09
On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 5:07 PM Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 21:45:55 +0200 Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:quoted
quoted
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c index c3efc7d658f6..790dd28fd198 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c@@ -1077,7 +1077,9 @@ static int __ip_append_data(struct sock *sk, if ((flags & MSG_MORE) && !(rt->dst.dev->features&NETIF_F_SG)) alloclen = mtu; - else if (!paged) + else if (!paged && + (fraglen + hh_len + 15 < SKB_MAX_ALLOC ||What does the number 15 represent here?No idea, it's there on the allocation line, so I need to include it on the size check. Looking at super old code (2.4.x) it looks like it may have gotten copy & pasted mistakenly? The hard headers are rounded up to 16B, and there is code which does things like: skb_alloc(size + dev->hard_header_len + 15); skb_reserve(skb, (dev->hard_header_len + 15) & ~15); in other spots. So if I was to guess I'd say someone decided to add the 15B "to be safe" even though hh_len already includes the round up here.
The 15 seems to come from alignment indeed. Not sure when it was
introduced, but until 56951b54e87a there is also this
/*
* Get the memory we require with some space left
for alignment.
*/
skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk, fraglen+hh_len+15, 0,
flags&MSG_DONTWAIT, &err);