Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 2 authors, 2021-06-14

Re: [PATCH iproute2] tc: pedit: add decrement operation

From: Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-14 22:57:55

Hi Stephen,

On 6/14/21 9:25 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 20:33:24 +0000
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen         [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
@@ -422,16 +434,21 @@ int parse_cmd(int *argc_p, char ***argv_p, __u32 len, int type, __u32 retain,
  		goto done;
  	}
  
  	return -1;
+

Please no unnecessary whitespace changes.
No problem, I tried to give context by using format-patch -U4,
so it didn't became it's own chunk. I included it to be
consistent within the function, having a blank line above
both label.

Also you are missing to print_pedit() to print the resulting change.
I didn't plan to since it is stored as TCA_PEDIT_KEY_EX_CMD_ADD,
hence it is printed as:

   key #0  at ipv4+8: add ff000000 mask 00ffffff
   or
   key #0  at ipv6+4: add 000000ff mask ffffff00

If really needed I could detect this, and print something else,
but that would break FP and/or JSON compatibility, which I
don't think is worth it.

print_pedit() is generally not a direct representation of it's
input parameters.

   tc filter add [...] action pedit ex \
     munge eth dst set aa:00:42:00:00:33 \
     munge eth src set aa:00:42:00:00:22 \
     munge ip6 hoplimit dec action [..]

becomes:

   key #0  at eth+0: val aa004200 mask 00000000
   key #1  at eth+4: val 00330000 mask 0000ffff
   key #2  at eth+4: val 0000aa00 mask ffff0000
   key #3  at eth+8: val 42000022 mask 00000000
   key #4  at ipv6+4: add 000000ff mask ffffff00

Note: key #1 and #2 could be consolidated.


Shortly after posting, I noticed that I forgot to amend explain(),
that will be in v2.

-- 
Best regards
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help