RE: [PATCH RESEND iproute2-next] devlink: Add optional controller user input
From: Parav Pandit <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-07 11:44:01
Hi David,
From: David Ahern <redacted> Sent: Monday, June 7, 2021 8:31 AM On 6/3/21 5:19 AM, Parav Pandit wrote:quoted
@@ -3795,7 +3806,7 @@ static void cmd_port_help(void) pr_err(" devlink port param set DEV/PORT_INDEX namePARAMETER value VALUE cmode { permanent | driverinit | runtime }\n");quoted
pr_err(" devlink port param show [DEV/PORT_INDEX namePARAMETER]\n");quoted
pr_err(" devlink port health show [ DEV/PORT_INDEX reporterREPORTER_NAME ]\n");quoted
- pr_err(" devlink port add DEV/PORT_INDEX flavour FLAVOURpfnum PFNUM [ sfnum SFNUM ]\n");quoted
+ pr_err(" devlink port add DEV/PORT_INDEX flavour FLAVOURpfnum PFNUM [ sfnum SFNUM ] [ controller CNUM ]\n");quoted
pr_err(" devlink port del DEV/PORT_INDEX\n"); }@@ -4324,7 +4335,7 @@ static int __cmd_health_show(struct dl *dl, boolshow_device, bool show_port); static void cmd_port_add_help(void) { - pr_err(" devlink port add { DEV | DEV/PORT_INDEX } flavourFLAVOUR pfnum PFNUM [ sfnum SFNUM ]\n");quoted
+ pr_err(" devlink port add { DEV | DEV/PORT_INDEX } flavourFLAVOUR pfnum PFNUM [ sfnum SFNUM ] [ controller CNUM ]\n"); This line and the one above need to be wrapped. This addition puts it well into the 90s.
It’s a print message. I was following coding style of [1] that says "However, never break user-visible strings such as printk messages because that breaks the ability to grep for them.". Recent code of dcb_ets.c has similar long string in print. So I didn't wrap it. Should we warp it? [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html#breaking-long-lines-and-strings