Re: [RFC bpf-next 1/4] net: xdp: introduce flags field in xdp_buff and xdp_frame
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-05-29 04:56:58
Also in:
bpf
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-05-29 04:56:58
Also in:
bpf
On Fri, 28 May 2021 14:18:33 -0700 Tom Herbert wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:44 AM Lorenzo Bianconi [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Introduce flag field in xdp_buff and xdp_frame data structure in order to report xdp_buffer metadata. For the moment just hw checksum hints are defined but flags field will be reused for xdp multi-buffer For the moment just CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY is supported. CHECKSUM_COMPLETE will need to set csum value in metada space.Lorenzo, This isn't sufficient for the checksum-unnecessary interface, we'd also need ability to set csum_level for cases the device validated more than one checksum. IMO, we shouldn't support CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY for new uses like this. For years now, the Linux community has been pleading with vendors to provide CHECKSUM_COMPLETE which is far more useful and robust than CHECSUM_UNNECESSARY, and yet some still haven't got with the program even though we see more and more instances where CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY doesn't even work at all (e.g. cases with SRv6, new encaps device doesn't understand). I believe it's time to take a stand! :-)
I must agree. Not supporting CHECKSUM_COMPLETE seems like a step back.