Re: [PATCH bpf-next] xsk: support AF_PACKET
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-28 10:54:58
Also in:
bpf
Daniel Borkmann [off-list ref] writes:
On 5/28/21 12:00 PM, Magnus Karlsson wrote:quoted
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:52 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, 28 May 2021 17:02:01 +0800 Xuan Zhuo [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, 28 May 2021 10:55:58 +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Xuan Zhuo [off-list ref] writes:quoted
In xsk mode, users cannot use AF_PACKET(tcpdump) to observe the current rx/tx data packets. This feature is very important in many cases. So this patch allows AF_PACKET to obtain xsk packages.You can use xdpdump to dump the packets from the XDP program before it gets redirected into the XSK: https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-tools/tree/master/xdp-dumpWow, this is a good idea.Yes, it is rather cool (credit to Eelco). Notice the extra info you can capture from 'exit', like XDP return codes, if_index, rx_queue. The tool uses the perf ring-buffer to send/copy data to userspace. This is actually surprisingly fast, but I still think AF_XDP will be faster (but it usually 'steals' the packet). Another (crazy?) idea is to extend this (and xdpdump), is to leverage Hangbin's recent XDP_REDIRECT extension e624d4ed4aa8 ("xdp: Extend xdp_redirect_map with broadcast support"). We now have a xdp_redirect_map flag BPF_F_BROADCAST, what if we create a BPF_F_CLONE_PASS flag? The semantic meaning of BPF_F_CLONE_PASS flag is to copy/clone the packet for the specified map target index (e.g AF_XDP map), but afterwards it does like veth/cpumap and creates an SKB from the xdp_frame (see __xdp_build_skb_from_frame()) and send to netstack. (Feel free to kick me if this doesn't make any sense)This would be a smooth way to implement clone support for AF_XDP. If we had this and someone added AF_XDP support to libpcap, we could both capture AF_XDP traffic with tcpdump (using this clone functionality in the XDP program) and speed up tcpdump for dumping traffic destined for regular sockets. Would that solve your use case Xuan? Note that I have not looked into the BPF_F_CLONE_PASS code, so do not know at this point what it would take to support this for XSKMAPs.Recently also ended up with something similar for our XDP LB to record pcaps [0] ;) My question is.. tcpdump doesn't really care where the packet data comes from, so why not extending libpcap's Linux-related internals to either capture from perf RB or BPF ringbuf rather than AF_PACKET sockets? Cloning is slow, and if you need to end up creating an skb which is then cloned once again inside AF_PACKET it's even worse. Just relying and reading out, say, perf RB you don't need any clones at all.
We discussed this when creating xdpdump and decided to keep it as a separate tool for the time being. I forget the details of the discussion, maybe Eelco remembers. Anyway, xdpdump does have a "pipe pcap to stdout" feature so you can do `xdpdump | tcpdump` and get the interactive output; and it will also save pcap information to disk, of course (using pcap-ng so it can also save metadata like XDP program name and return code). -Toke