Re: [PATCH] net: fix oops in socket ioctl cmd SIOCGSKNS when NET_NS is disabled
From: Changbin Du <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-31 17:18:22
Also in:
lkml, stable
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 08:30:58AM +0000, David Laight wrote:
From: Cong Wangquoted
Sent: 29 May 2021 20:15 On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:08 PM Changbin Du [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
diff --git a/net/socket.c b/net/socket.c index 27e3e7d53f8e..644b46112d35 100644 --- a/net/socket.c +++ b/net/socket.c@@ -1149,11 +1149,15 @@ static long sock_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned cmd, unsigned long arg) mutex_unlock(&vlan_ioctl_mutex); break; case SIOCGSKNS: +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS err = -EPERM; if (!ns_capable(net->user_ns, CAP_NET_ADMIN)) break; err = open_related_ns(&net->ns, get_net_ns); +#else + err = -ENOTSUPP; +#endifI wonder if it is easier if we just reject ns->ops==NULL case in open_related_ns(). For 1) we can save an ugly #ifdef here; 2) drivers/net/tun.c has the same bugs.If CONFIG_NET_NS is unset then why not make both ns_capable() and open_related_ns() unconditionally return -ENOTSUPP?
Here is the new fix that reject creating indoe for disabled ns.
--- a/fs/nsfs.c
+++ b/fs/nsfs.c@@ -62,6 +62,10 @@ static int __ns_get_path(struct path *path, struct ns_common *ns) struct inode *inode; unsigned long d; + /* In case the namespace is not actually enabled. */ + if (!ns->ops) + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
David - Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
-- Cheers, Changbin Du