Re: [PATCH] net: macb: ensure the device is available before accessing GEMGXL control registers
From: Zong Li <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-22 09:09:00
Also in:
linux-riscv, lkml
On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 12:51 AM Florian Fainelli [off-list ref] wrote:
On 5/21/2021 5:48 AM, Zong Li wrote:quoted
If runtime power menagement is enabled, the gigabit ethernet PLL would be disabled after macb_probe(). During this period of time, the system would hang up if we try to access GEMGXL control registers. We can't put runtime_pm_get/runtime_pm_put/ there due to the issue of sleep inside atomic section (7fa2955ff70ce453 ("sh_eth: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context"). Add the similar flag to ensure the device is available before accessing GEMGXL device. Signed-off-by: Zong Li <redacted> --- drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h | 2 ++ drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c | 7 +++++++ 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h index d8d87213697c..acf5242ce715 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb.h@@ -1309,6 +1309,8 @@ struct macb { u32 rx_intr_mask; + unsigned int is_opened; + struct macb_pm_data pm_data; const struct macb_usrio_config *usrio; };diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c index 6bc7d41d519b..e079ed10ad91 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cadence/macb_main.c@@ -2781,6 +2781,8 @@ static int macb_open(struct net_device *dev) if (bp->ptp_info) bp->ptp_info->ptp_init(dev); + bp->is_opened = 1; + return 0; reset_hw:@@ -2818,6 +2820,8 @@ static int macb_close(struct net_device *dev) if (bp->ptp_info) bp->ptp_info->ptp_remove(dev); + bp->is_opened = 0; + pm_runtime_put(&bp->pdev->dev); return 0;@@ -2867,6 +2871,9 @@ static struct net_device_stats *gem_get_stats(struct macb *bp) struct gem_stats *hwstat = &bp->hw_stats.gem; struct net_device_stats *nstat = &bp->dev->stats; + if (!bp->is_opened) + return nstat;The canonical way to do this check is to use netif_running(), and not open code a boolean tracking whether a network device is opened or not.
Yes, I have tried this and it worked. Let me change it in the next version.
-- Florian