[PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Make some symbols static
From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Date: 2021-05-19 06:40:50
Also in:
bpf, lkml
Subsystem:
bpf [core], bpf [general] (safe dynamic programs and tools), the rest · Maintainers:
Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Andrii Nakryiko, Eduard Zingerman, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Linus Torvalds
The sparse tool complains as follows: kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4567:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_sys_bpf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4592:29: warning: symbol 'bpf_sys_close_proto' was not declared. Should it be static? This symbol is not used outside of syscall.c, so marks it static. Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> --- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 2361d97e2c67..73d15bc62d8c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c@@ -4564,7 +4564,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_sys_bpf, int, cmd, void *, attr, u32, attr_size) return __sys_bpf(cmd, KERNEL_BPFPTR(attr), attr_size); } -const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_bpf_proto = { +static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_bpf_proto = { .func = bpf_sys_bpf, .gpl_only = false, .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
@@ -4589,7 +4589,7 @@ BPF_CALL_1(bpf_sys_close, u32, fd) return close_fd(fd); } -const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_close_proto = { +static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_close_proto = { .func = bpf_sys_close, .gpl_only = false, .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
--
2.17.1