Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 3 authors, 2021-05-12

Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/ip_fragment:fix missing Flags reserved bit set in iphdr

From: David Ahern <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-11 03:06:01
Also in: lkml

On 5/10/21 7:18 PM, meijusan wrote:
At 2021-05-08 06:59:00, "Jakub Kicinski" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Thu,  6 May 2021 22:59:05 +0800 meijusan wrote:
quoted
ip frag with the iphdr flags reserved bit set,via router,ip frag reasm or
fragment,causing the reserved bit is reset to zero.

Keep reserved bit set is not modified in ip frag  defrag or fragment.

Signed-off-by: meijusan <redacted>
Could you please provide more background on why we'd want to do this?
quoted
Preferably with references to relevant (non-April Fools' Day) RFCs.
[background]
the Simple network usage scenarios: the one PC software<--->linux router(L3)/linux bridege(L2,bridge-nf-call-iptables)<--->the other PC software
1)the PC software send the ip packet with the iphdr flags reserved bit is set, when ip packet(not fragments ) via the one linux router/linux bridge,and the iphdr flags reserved bit is not modified;
2)but the ip fragments via router,the linux IP reassembly or fragmentation ,causing the reserved bit is reset to zero,Which leads to The other PC software depending on the reserved bit set  process the Packet failed.
[rfc]
RFC791
Bit 0: reserved, must be zero
RFC3514
Introduction This bit , but The scene seems different from us,we expect Keep reserved bit set is not modified when forward the linux router



Why process the packet at all? If a reserved bit must be 0 and it is
not, drop the packet.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help