Thread (39 messages) read the whole thread 39 messages, 5 authors, 2021-04-22

Re: [PATCHv7 bpf-next 1/4] bpf: run devmap xdp_prog on flush instead of bulk enqueue

From: Martin KaFai Lau <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-15 00:17:36
Also in: bpf

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:26:07PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
[ ... ]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
index aa516472ce46..3980fb3bfb09 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ struct xdp_dev_bulk_queue {
 	struct list_head flush_node;
 	struct net_device *dev;
 	struct net_device *dev_rx;
+	struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
 	unsigned int count;
 };
 
@@ -326,22 +327,71 @@ bool dev_map_can_have_prog(struct bpf_map *map)
 	return false;
 }
 
+static int dev_map_bpf_prog_run(struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog,
+				struct xdp_frame **frames, int n,
+				struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	struct xdp_txq_info txq = { .dev = dev };
+	struct xdp_buff xdp;
+	int i, nframes = 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+		struct xdp_frame *xdpf = frames[i];
+		u32 act;
+		int err;
+
+		xdp_convert_frame_to_buff(xdpf, &xdp);
+		xdp.txq = &txq;
+
+		act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(xdp_prog, &xdp);
+		switch (act) {
+		case XDP_PASS:
+			err = xdp_update_frame_from_buff(&xdp, xdpf);
+			if (unlikely(err < 0))
+				xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf);
+			else
+				frames[nframes++] = xdpf;
+			break;
+		default:
+			bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act);
+			fallthrough;
+		case XDP_ABORTED:
+			trace_xdp_exception(dev, xdp_prog, act);
+			fallthrough;
+		case XDP_DROP:
+			xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	return nframes; /* sent frames count */
+}
+
 static void bq_xmit_all(struct xdp_dev_bulk_queue *bq, u32 flags)
 {
 	struct net_device *dev = bq->dev;
-	int sent = 0, err = 0;
+	int sent = 0, drops = 0, err = 0;
+	unsigned int cnt = bq->count;
+	int to_send = cnt;
 	int i;
 
-	if (unlikely(!bq->count))
+	if (unlikely(!cnt))
 		return;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < bq->count; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
 		struct xdp_frame *xdpf = bq->q[i];
 
 		prefetch(xdpf);
 	}
 
-	sent = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xdp_xmit(dev, bq->count, bq->q, flags);
+	if (bq->xdp_prog) {
bq->xdp_prog is used here
+		to_send = dev_map_bpf_prog_run(bq->xdp_prog, bq->q, cnt, dev);
+		if (!to_send)
+			goto out;
+
+		drops = cnt - to_send;
+	}
+
[ ... ]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 static void bq_enqueue(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_frame *xdpf,
-		       struct net_device *dev_rx)
+		       struct net_device *dev_rx, struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog)
 {
 	struct list_head *flush_list = this_cpu_ptr(&dev_flush_list);
 	struct xdp_dev_bulk_queue *bq = this_cpu_ptr(dev->xdp_bulkq);
@@ -412,18 +466,22 @@ static void bq_enqueue(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_frame *xdpf,
 	/* Ingress dev_rx will be the same for all xdp_frame's in
 	 * bulk_queue, because bq stored per-CPU and must be flushed
 	 * from net_device drivers NAPI func end.
+	 *
+	 * Do the same with xdp_prog and flush_list since these fields
+	 * are only ever modified together.
 	 */
-	if (!bq->dev_rx)
+	if (!bq->dev_rx) {
 		bq->dev_rx = dev_rx;
+		bq->xdp_prog = xdp_prog;
bp->xdp_prog is assigned here and could be used later in bq_xmit_all().
How is bq->xdp_prog protected? Are they all under one rcu_read_lock()?
It is not very obvious after taking a quick look at xdp_do_flush[_map].

e.g. what if the devmap elem gets deleted.

[ ... ]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 static inline int __xdp_enqueue(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
-			       struct net_device *dev_rx)
+				struct net_device *dev_rx,
+				struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog)
 {
 	struct xdp_frame *xdpf;
 	int err;
@@ -439,42 +497,14 @@ static inline int __xdp_enqueue(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
 	if (unlikely(!xdpf))
 		return -EOVERFLOW;
 
-	bq_enqueue(dev, xdpf, dev_rx);
+	bq_enqueue(dev, xdpf, dev_rx, xdp_prog);
 	return 0;
 }
 
[ ... ]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -482,12 +512,7 @@ int dev_map_enqueue(struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dst, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
 {
 	struct net_device *dev = dst->dev;
 
-	if (dst->xdp_prog) {
-		xdp = dev_map_run_prog(dev, xdp, dst->xdp_prog);
-		if (!xdp)
-			return 0;
-	}
-	return __xdp_enqueue(dev, xdp, dev_rx);
+	return __xdp_enqueue(dev, xdp, dev_rx, dst->xdp_prog);
 }
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help