Re: [PATCHv7 bpf-next 1/4] bpf: run devmap xdp_prog on flush instead of bulk enqueue
From: Martin KaFai Lau <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-15 00:17:36
Also in:
bpf
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 08:26:07PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote: [ ... ]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c index aa516472ce46..3980fb3bfb09 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/devmap.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/devmap.c@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ struct xdp_dev_bulk_queue { struct list_head flush_node; struct net_device *dev; struct net_device *dev_rx; + struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog; unsigned int count; };@@ -326,22 +327,71 @@ bool dev_map_can_have_prog(struct bpf_map *map) return false; } +static int dev_map_bpf_prog_run(struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog, + struct xdp_frame **frames, int n, + struct net_device *dev) +{ + struct xdp_txq_info txq = { .dev = dev }; + struct xdp_buff xdp; + int i, nframes = 0; + + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { + struct xdp_frame *xdpf = frames[i]; + u32 act; + int err; + + xdp_convert_frame_to_buff(xdpf, &xdp); + xdp.txq = &txq; + + act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(xdp_prog, &xdp); + switch (act) { + case XDP_PASS: + err = xdp_update_frame_from_buff(&xdp, xdpf); + if (unlikely(err < 0)) + xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf); + else + frames[nframes++] = xdpf; + break; + default: + bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act); + fallthrough; + case XDP_ABORTED: + trace_xdp_exception(dev, xdp_prog, act); + fallthrough; + case XDP_DROP: + xdp_return_frame_rx_napi(xdpf); + break; + } + } + return nframes; /* sent frames count */ +} + static void bq_xmit_all(struct xdp_dev_bulk_queue *bq, u32 flags) { struct net_device *dev = bq->dev; - int sent = 0, err = 0; + int sent = 0, drops = 0, err = 0; + unsigned int cnt = bq->count; + int to_send = cnt; int i; - if (unlikely(!bq->count)) + if (unlikely(!cnt)) return; - for (i = 0; i < bq->count; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) { struct xdp_frame *xdpf = bq->q[i]; prefetch(xdpf); } - sent = dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xdp_xmit(dev, bq->count, bq->q, flags); + if (bq->xdp_prog) {
bq->xdp_prog is used here
+ to_send = dev_map_bpf_prog_run(bq->xdp_prog, bq->q, cnt, dev); + if (!to_send) + goto out; + + drops = cnt - to_send; + } +
[ ... ]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
static void bq_enqueue(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_frame *xdpf, - struct net_device *dev_rx) + struct net_device *dev_rx, struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog) { struct list_head *flush_list = this_cpu_ptr(&dev_flush_list); struct xdp_dev_bulk_queue *bq = this_cpu_ptr(dev->xdp_bulkq);@@ -412,18 +466,22 @@ static void bq_enqueue(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_frame *xdpf, /* Ingress dev_rx will be the same for all xdp_frame's in * bulk_queue, because bq stored per-CPU and must be flushed * from net_device drivers NAPI func end. + * + * Do the same with xdp_prog and flush_list since these fields + * are only ever modified together. */ - if (!bq->dev_rx) + if (!bq->dev_rx) { bq->dev_rx = dev_rx; + bq->xdp_prog = xdp_prog;
bp->xdp_prog is assigned here and could be used later in bq_xmit_all(). How is bq->xdp_prog protected? Are they all under one rcu_read_lock()? It is not very obvious after taking a quick look at xdp_do_flush[_map]. e.g. what if the devmap elem gets deleted. [ ... ]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
static inline int __xdp_enqueue(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_buff *xdp, - struct net_device *dev_rx) + struct net_device *dev_rx, + struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog) { struct xdp_frame *xdpf; int err;@@ -439,42 +497,14 @@ static inline int __xdp_enqueue(struct net_device *dev, struct xdp_buff *xdp, if (unlikely(!xdpf)) return -EOVERFLOW; - bq_enqueue(dev, xdpf, dev_rx); + bq_enqueue(dev, xdpf, dev_rx, xdp_prog); return 0; }
[ ... ]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -482,12 +512,7 @@ int dev_map_enqueue(struct bpf_dtab_netdev *dst, struct xdp_buff *xdp, { struct net_device *dev = dst->dev; - if (dst->xdp_prog) { - xdp = dev_map_run_prog(dev, xdp, dst->xdp_prog); - if (!xdp) - return 0; - } - return __xdp_enqueue(dev, xdp, dev_rx); + return __xdp_enqueue(dev, xdp, dev_rx, dst->xdp_prog); }