On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 2:21 PM Thomas Gleixner [off-list ref] wrote:

Nitesh,

On Fri, Apr 30 2021 at 12:14, Nitesh Lal wrote:

quoted

Based on this analysis and the fact that with your re-work the interrupts
seems to be naturally spread across the CPUs, will it be safe to revert
Jesse's patch

e2e64a932 genirq: Set initial affinity in irq_set_affinity_hint()

as it overwrites the previously set IRQ affinity mask for some of the
devices?

That's a good question. My gut feeling says yes.

Jesse do you want to send the revert for the patch?

Also, I think it was you who suggested cc'ing
intel-wired-lan ml as that allows intel folks, to do some initial
testing?
If so, we can do that here (IMHO).

quoted

IMHO if we think that this patch is still solving some issue other than
what Jesse has mentioned then perhaps we should reproduce that and fix it
directly from the request_irq code path.

Makes sense.

Thanks,

        tglx

-- 
Thanks
Nitesh