Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/6] net: add generic selftest support
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2021-04-30 07:49:45
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
Hi Oleksij, On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 9:26 AM Oleksij Rempel [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 08:45:05AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:13 PM Oleksij Rempel [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Port some parts of the stmmac selftest and reuse it as basic generic selftest library. This patch was tested with following combinations: - iMX6DL FEC -> AT8035 - iMX6DL FEC -> SJA1105Q switch -> KSZ8081 - iMX6DL FEC -> SJA1105Q switch -> KSZ9031 - AR9331 ag71xx -> AR9331 PHY - AR9331 ag71xx -> AR9331 switch -> AR9331 PHY Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 3e1e58d64c3d0a67 ("net: add generic selftest support") upstream.quoted
--- a/net/Kconfig +++ b/net/Kconfig@@ -429,6 +429,10 @@ config GRO_CELLS config SOCK_VALIDATE_XMIT bool +config NET_SELFTESTS + def_tristate PHYLIBWhy does this default to enabled if PHYLIB=y? Usually we allow the user to make selftests modular, independent of the feature under test, but I may misunderstand the purpose of this test. Thanks for your clarification!There is nothing against making optional. Should I do it?
Yes please. Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds