Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Add a check for gss_release_msg

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 09:36:05AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 08:29:53AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:

quoted

On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 08:41:27PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:

quoted

On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 05:34:54PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:

quoted

In Greg's revert thread, Kangjie Lu's messages are also missing from the
archives:

	https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210421130105.1226686-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org/ (local)

I'm going to guess it's one of two things.  The first is that they are
sending mail messages with HTML which is getting bounced; the other
possibility is that some of the messages were sent only to Greg, and
he added the mailing list back to the cc.

So for exampple, message-id
CA+EnHHSw4X+ubOUNYP2zXNpu70G74NN1Sct2Zin6pRgq--TqhA@mail.gmail.com
isn't in lore, but Greg's reply:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/YH%2FfM%2FTsbmcZzwnX@kroah.com/ (local)

can be found in lore.kernel.org was presumably because the message
where Aditya accused "wild accusations bordering on slander" and his
claim that his patches were the fault of a "new static code analyzer"
was sent only to Greg?  Either that, or it was bounced because he sent
it from gmail without suppressing HTML.

I did not "add back" the mailing list, it looks like they sent email in
html format which prevented it from hitting the public lists.  I have
the originals sent to me that shows the author intended it to be public.

Yes, the list cc's are all on there.

It's multipart/alternative with equivalent plain text and html parts,
which appears to be gmail's default behavior.  Is that really rejected
by default?

Hah, when I sent that mail I quoted parts of the message including the
Content-Type headers delineating the parts and got an immediate bounce
saying "The message contains HTML subpart, therefore we consider it SPAM
or Outlook Virus.  TEXT/PLAIN is accepted".

Which seems perfectly clear.  OK, sorry for the noise!

--b.