Thread (4 messages) flat view 4 messages, 4 authors, 2021-04-23

Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: fix warning comparing pointer to 0

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: 2021-04-22 21:56:27
Also in: bpf, linux-kselftest, lkml

On 4/22/21 12:00 PM, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
Fix the following coccicheck warning:

./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c:76:15-16: WARNING
comparing pointer to 0.

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <redacted>
How many more of those 'comparing pointer to 0' patches do you have?
Right now we already merged the following with similar trivial pattern:

  - ebda107e5f222a086c83ddf6d1ab1da97dd15810
  - a9c80b03e586fd3819089fbd33c38fb65ad5e00c
  - 04ea63e34a2ee85cfd38578b3fc97b2d4c9dd573

Given they don't really 'fix' anything, I would like to reduce such
patch cleanup churn on the bpf tree. Please _consolidate_ all other
such occurrences into a _single_ patch for BPF selftests, and resubmit.

Thanks!
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c
index 52a550d..d4247d6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/fentry_test.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(test7, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
  SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test8")
  int BPF_PROG(test8, struct bpf_fentry_test_t *arg)
  {
-	if (arg->a == 0)
+	if (!arg->a)
  		test8_result = 1;
  	return 0;
  }
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help