Re: [PATCH] net: called rtnl_unlock() before runpm resumes devices
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-04-22 07:09:47
Also in:
lkml
On 22.04.2021 08:30, AceLan Kao wrote:
Yes, should add
Fixes: 9474933caf21 ("igb: close/suspend race in netif_device_detach")
and also
Fixes: 9513d2a5dc7f ("igc: Add legacy power management support")Please don't top-post. Apart from that: If the issue was introduced with driver changes, then adding a workaround in net core may not be the right approach.
Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] 於 2021年4月21日 週三 上午3:27寫道:quoted
On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 10:34:17 +0200 Eric Dumazet wrote:quoted
On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 9:54 AM AceLan Kao [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: "Chia-Lin Kao (AceLan)" <acelan.kao@canonical.com> The rtnl_lock() has been called in rtnetlink_rcv_msg(), and then in __dev_open() it calls pm_runtime_resume() to resume devices, and in some devices' resume function(igb_resum,igc_resume) they calls rtnl_lock() again. That leads to a recursive lock. It should leave the devices' resume function to decide if they need to call rtnl_lock()/rtnl_unlock(), so call rtnl_unlock() before calling pm_runtime_resume() and then call rtnl_lock() after it in __dev_open().Hi Acelan When was the bugg added ? Please add a Fixes: tagFor immediate cause probably: Fixes: 9474933caf21 ("igb: close/suspend race in netif_device_detach")quoted
By doing so, you give more chances for reviewers to understand why the fix is not risky, and help stable teams work.IMO the driver lacks internal locking. Taking rtnl from resume is just one example, git history shows many more places that lacked locking and got papered over with rtnl here.