Hi all,
Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 3/5/21 03:44, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
index e24b2841c643..880a1ab9a305 100644
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -1652,6 +1652,7 @@ static int fanout_add(struct sock *sk, struct fanout_args *args)
case PACKET_FANOUT_ROLLOVER:
if (type_flags & PACKET_FANOUT_FLAG_ROLLOVER)
return -EINVAL;
+ break;
case PACKET_FANOUT_HASH:
case PACKET_FANOUT_LB:
case PACKET_FANOUT_CPU: