Hi all,
Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks
--
Gustavo
On 3/5/21 03:25, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
net/tipc/link.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c
index 115109259430..bcc426e16725 100644
--- a/net/tipc/link.c
+++ b/net/tipc/link.c
@@ -649,6 +649,7 @@ int tipc_link_fsm_evt(struct tipc_link *l, int evt)
break;
case LINK_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT:
l->state = LINK_FAILINGOVER;
+ break;
case LINK_FAILURE_EVT:
case LINK_RESET_EVT:
case LINK_ESTABLISH_EVT: