Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 3 authors, 2021-04-16

Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] vDPA/ifcvf: enable Intel C5000X-PL virtio-block for vDPA

From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-04-15 13:42:01
Also in: kvm, lkml, virtualization

On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 05:53:35PM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
This commit enabled Intel FPGA SmartNIC C5000X-PL virtio-block
for vDPA.

Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <redacted>
---
drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h |  8 +++++++-
drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 10 +++++++++-
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
index 1c04cd256fa7..0111bfdeb342 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
#include <linux/pci_regs.h>
#include <linux/vdpa.h>
#include <uapi/linux/virtio_net.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/virtio_blk.h>
#include <uapi/linux/virtio_config.h>
#include <uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h>
@@ -28,7 +29,12 @@
#define C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID	0x8086
#define C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID	0x0001

-#define IFCVF_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \
+#define C5000X_PL_BLK_VENDOR_ID		0x1AF4
+#define C5000X_PL_BLK_DEVICE_ID		0x1001
+#define C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID	0x8086
+#define C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID	0x0002
+
+#define IFCVF_NET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES \
		((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC)			| \
		 (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT)			| \
		 (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)			| \
diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
index 469a9b5737b7..cea1313b1a3f 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
@@ -171,7 +171,11 @@ static u64 ifcvf_vdpa_get_features(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev)
	struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev);
	u64 features;

-	features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & IFCVF_SUPPORTED_FEATURES;
+	if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_NET)
+		features = ifcvf_get_features(vf) & IFCVF_NET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES;
+
+	if (vf->dev_type == VIRTIO_ID_BLOCK)
+		features = ifcvf_get_features(vf);
Should we put a warning here too otherwise feature could be seen 
unassigned?

Thanks,
Stefano
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
	return features;
}
@@ -517,6 +521,10 @@ static struct pci_device_id ifcvf_pci_ids[] = {
			 C5000X_PL_DEVICE_ID,
			 C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID,
			 C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) },
+	{ PCI_DEVICE_SUB(C5000X_PL_BLK_VENDOR_ID,
+			 C5000X_PL_BLK_DEVICE_ID,
+			 C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID,
+			 C5000X_PL_BLK_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) },

	{ 0 },
};
-- 
2.27.0
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help