On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 19:34:55 -0700 Dexuan Cui wrote:

+	for (i = 0; i < ANA_INDIRECT_TABLE_SIZE; i++)
+		apc->indir_table[i] = i % apc->num_queues;

ethtool_rxfh_indir_default()

+	err = mana_cfg_vport_steering(apc, rx, true, update_hash, update_tab);
+	return err;

return mana_...

please fix everywhere.

+	netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(ndev, apc->num_queues);
+
+	err = mana_add_rx_queues(apc, ndev);
+	if (err)
+		goto destroy_vport;
+
+	apc->rss_state = apc->num_queues > 1 ? TRI_STATE_TRUE : TRI_STATE_FALSE;
+
+	netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(ndev, apc->num_queues);

netif_set_real_num_.. can fail.

+	rtnl_lock();
+
+	netdev_lockdep_set_classes(ndev);
+
+	ndev->hw_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM;
+	ndev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
+	ndev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
+	ndev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_RXHASH;
+	ndev->features = ndev->hw_features;
+	ndev->vlan_features = 0;
+
+	err = register_netdevice(ndev);
+	if (err) {
+		netdev_err(ndev, "Unable to register netdev.\n");
+		goto destroy_vport;
+	}
+
+	rtnl_unlock();
+
+	return 0;
+destroy_vport:
+	rtnl_unlock();

Why do you take rtnl_lock() explicitly around this code?

+static int mana_set_channels(struct net_device *ndev,
+			     struct ethtool_channels *channels)
+{
+	struct ana_port_context *apc = netdev_priv(ndev);
+	unsigned int new_count;
+	unsigned int old_count;
+	int err, err2;
+
+	new_count = channels->combined_count;
+	old_count = apc->num_queues;
+
+	if (new_count < 1 || new_count > apc->max_queues ||
+	    channels->rx_count || channels->tx_count || channels->other_count)

All these checks should be done by the core already.

+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (new_count == old_count)
+		return 0;

And so is this one.

+	err = mana_detach(ndev);
+	if (err) {
+		netdev_err(ndev, "mana_detach failed: %d\n", err);
+		return err;
+	}