Re: Packet gets stuck in NOLOCK pfifo_fast qdisc
From: Yunsheng Lin <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-06 12:18:00
Also in:
lkml
Subsystem:
networking [general], tc subsystem, the rest · Maintainers:
"David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Jamal Hadi Salim, Jiri Pirko, Linus Torvalds
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2021-04-02 · Re: Packet gets stuck in NOLOCK pfifo_fast qdisc · Josh Hunt <hidden>
- 2021-04-02 · Re: Packet gets stuck in NOLOCK pfifo_fast qdisc · Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
- 2020-09-18 · Re: Packet gets stuck in NOLOCK pfifo_fast qdisc · Kehuan Feng <hidden>
- 2020-09-17 · Re: Packet gets stuck in NOLOCK pfifo_fast qdisc · Cong Wang <hidden>
- 2020-09-14 · Re: Packet gets stuck in NOLOCK pfifo_fast qdisc · Yunsheng Lin <hidden>
On 2021/4/6 18:13, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 06.04.21 09:06, Michal Kubecek wrote:quoted
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 08:55:41AM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:quoted
Hi, Jiri Do you have a reproducer that can be shared here? With reproducer, I can debug and test it myself too.I'm afraid we are not aware of a simple reproducer. As mentioned in the original discussion, the race window is extremely small and the other thread has to do quite a lot in the meantime which is probably why, as far as I know, this was never observed on real hardware, only in virtualization environments. NFS may also be important as, IIUC, it can often issue an RPC request from a different CPU right after a data transfer. Perhaps you could cheat a bit and insert a random delay between the empty queue check and releasing q->seqlock to make it more likely to happen. Other than that, it's rather just "run this complex software in a xen VM and wait".Being the one who has managed to reproduce the issue I can share my setup, maybe you can setup something similar (we have seen the issue with this kind of setup on two different machines). I'm using a physical machine with 72 cpus and 48 GB of memory. It is running Xen as virtualization platform. Xen dom0 is limited to 40 vcpus and 32 GB of memory, the dom0 vcpus are limited to run on the first 40 physical cpus (no idea whether that matters, though). In a guest with 16 vcpu and 8GB of memory I'm running 8 parallel sysbench instances in a loop, those instances are prepared via sysbench --file-test-mode=rndrd --test=fileio prepare and then started in a do while loop via: sysbench --test=fileio --file-test-mode=rndrw --rand-seed=0 --max-time=300 --max-requests=0 run Each instance is using a dedicated NFS mount to run on. The NFS server for the 8 mounts is running in dom0 of the same server, the data of the NFS shares is located in a RAM disk (size is a little bit above 16GB). The shares are mounted in the guest with: mount -t nfs -o rw,proto=tcp,nolock,nfsvers=3,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,nosharetransport dom0:/ramdisk/share[1-8] /mnt[1-8] The guests vcpus are limited to run on physical cpus 40-55, on the same physical cpus I have 16 small guests running eating up cpu time, each of those guests is pinned to one of the physical cpus 40-55. That's basically it. All you need to do is to watch out for sysbench reporting maximum latencies above one second or so (in my setup there are latencies of several minutes at least once each hour of testing). In case you'd like to have some more details about the setup don't hesitate to contact me directly. I can provide you with some scripts and config runes if you want.
The setup is rather complex, I just tried Michal' suggestion using the below patch:
diff --git a/include/net/sch_generic.h b/include/net/sch_generic.h
index 9fb0ad4..b691eda 100644
--- a/include/net/sch_generic.h
+++ b/include/net/sch_generic.h@@ -207,6 +207,11 @@ static inline void qdisc_run_end(struct Qdisc *qdisc) { write_seqcount_end(&qdisc->running); if (qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK) { + udelay(10000); + udelay(10000); + udelay(10000); + udelay(10000); + udelay(10000); spin_unlock(&qdisc->seqlock); if (unlikely(test_bit(__QDISC_STATE_MISSED,
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
index 6d7f954..a83c520 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c@@ -630,6 +630,8 @@ static int pfifo_fast_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *qdisc, return qdisc_drop_cpu(skb, qdisc, to_free); else return qdisc_drop(skb, qdisc, to_free); + } else { + skb->enqueue_jiffies = jiffies; } qdisc_update_stats_at_enqueue(qdisc, pkt_len);
@@ -653,6 +655,13 @@ static struct sk_buff *pfifo_fast_dequeue(struct Qdisc *qdisc) skb = __skb_array_consume(q); } if (likely(skb)) { + unsigned int delay_ms; + + delay_ms = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - skb->enqueue_jiffies);
linyunsheng@plinth:~/ci/kernel$ vi qdisc_reproducer.patch
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h@@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ struct sk_buff { *data; unsigned int truesize; refcount_t users; - + unsigned long enqueue_jiffies; #ifdef CONFIG_SKB_EXTENSIONS /* only useable after checking ->active_extensions != 0 */ struct skb_ext *extensions;
diff --git a/include/net/sch_generic.h b/include/net/sch_generic.h
index 639e465..ba39b86 100644
--- a/include/net/sch_generic.h
+++ b/include/net/sch_generic.h@@ -176,8 +176,14 @@ static inline bool qdisc_run_begin(struct Qdisc *qdisc) static inline void qdisc_run_end(struct Qdisc *qdisc) { write_seqcount_end(&qdisc->running); - if (qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK) + if (qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK) { + udelay(10000); + udelay(10000); + udelay(10000); + udelay(10000); + udelay(10000); spin_unlock(&qdisc->seqlock); + } } static inline bool qdisc_may_bulk(const struct Qdisc *qdisc)
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
index 49eae93..fcfae43 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c@@ -630,6 +630,8 @@ static int pfifo_fast_enqueue(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *qdisc, return qdisc_drop_cpu(skb, qdisc, to_free); else return qdisc_drop(skb, qdisc, to_free); + } else { + skb->enqueue_jiffies = jiffies; } qdisc_update_stats_at_enqueue(qdisc, pkt_len);
@@ -651,6 +653,13 @@ static struct sk_buff *pfifo_fast_dequeue(struct Qdisc *qdisc) skb = __skb_array_consume(q); } if (likely(skb)) { + unsigned int delay_ms; + + delay_ms = jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies - skb->enqueue_jiffies); + + if (delay_ms > 100) + netdev_err(qdisc_dev(qdisc), "delay: %u ms\n", delay_ms); + qdisc_update_stats_at_dequeue(qdisc, skb); } else { WRITE_ONCE(qdisc->empty, true);
Using the below shell: while((1)) do taskset -c 0 mz dummy1 -d 10000 -c 100& taskset -c 1 mz dummy1 -d 10000 -c 100& taskset -c 2 mz dummy1 -d 10000 -c 100& sleep 3 done And got the below log: [ 80.881716] hns3 0000:bd:00.0 eth2: delay: 176 ms [ 82.036564] hns3 0000:bd:00.0 eth2: delay: 296 ms [ 87.065820] hns3 0000:bd:00.0 eth2: delay: 320 ms [ 94.134174] dummy1: delay: 1588 ms [ 94.137570] dummy1: delay: 1580 ms [ 94.140963] dummy1: delay: 1572 ms [ 94.144354] dummy1: delay: 1568 ms [ 94.147745] dummy1: delay: 1560 ms [ 99.065800] hns3 0000:bd:00.0 eth2: delay: 264 ms [ 100.106174] dummy1: delay: 1448 ms [ 102.169799] hns3 0000:bd:00.0 eth2: delay: 436 ms [ 103.166221] dummy1: delay: 1604 ms [ 103.169617] dummy1: delay: 1604 ms [ 104.985806] dummy1: delay: 316 ms [ 105.113797] hns3 0000:bd:00.0 eth2: delay: 308 ms [ 107.289805] hns3 0000:bd:00.0 eth2: delay: 556 ms [ 108.912922] hns3 0000:bd:00.0 eth2: delay: 188 ms [ 137.241801] dummy1: delay: 30624 ms [ 137.245283] dummy1: delay: 30620 ms [ 137.248760] dummy1: delay: 30616 ms [ 137.252237] dummy1: delay: 30616 ms It seems the problem can be easily reproduced using Michal' suggestion. Will test and debug it using the above reproducer first.
Juergen