Thread (12 messages) flat view 12 messages, 4 authors, 2021-04-23

Re: [PATCH net 1/2] openvswitch: fix stack OOB read while fragmenting IPv4 packets

From: "Eelco Chaudron" <echaudro@redhat.com>
Date: 2021-04-22 09:17:26


On 21 Apr 2021, at 17:05, Davide Caratti wrote:
hello Eelco, thanks for looking at this!

On Wed, 2021-04-21 at 11:27 +0200, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
quoted
On 19 Apr 2021, at 17:23, Davide Caratti wrote:
quoted
running openvswitch on kernels built with KASAN, it's possible to 
see
the
following splat while testing fragmentation of IPv4 packets:
<SNIP>
quoted
for IPv4 packets, ovs_fragment() uses a temporary struct dst_entry.
Then,
in the following call graph:

  ip_do_fragment()
    ip_skb_dst_mtu()
      ip_dst_mtu_maybe_forward()
        ip_mtu_locked()

the pointer to struct dst_entry is used as pointer to struct rtable:
this
turns the access to struct members like rt_mtu_locked into an OOB 
read
in
the stack. Fix this changing the temporary variable used for IPv4
packets
in ovs_fragment(), similarly to what is done for IPv6 few lines 
below.

Fixes: d52e5a7e7ca4 ("ipv4: lock mtu in fnhe when received PMTU <
net.ipv4.route.min_pmt")
Cc: <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Davide Caratti <redacted>
The fix looks good to me, however isn’t the real root cause
ip_mtu_locked() who casts struct dst_entry to struct rtable (not even
using container_of())?
good point, that's my understanding (and the reason for that 'Fixes:'
tag). Probably openvswitch was doing this on purpose, and it was "just
working" until commit d52e5a7e7ca4.

But at the current state, I see much easier to just fix the IPv4 part 
to
have the same behavior as other "users" of ip_do_fragment(), like it
happens for ovs_fragment() when the packet is IPv6 (or br_netfilter
core, see [1]).

By the way, apparently ip_do_fragment() already assumes that a struct
rtable is available for the skb [2]. So, the fix in ovs_fragment() 
looks
safer to me. WDYT?
It looks like the assumption that a dst_entry is always embedded in 
rtable seems deeply embedded already, looking at skb_rtable(), so I 
agree this patch is the best solution.

So again, Acked-by: Eelco Chaudron [off-list ref]
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help