Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 2 authors, 2021-04-02

Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] net: Add a WWAN subsystem

From: Loic Poulain <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-31 11:36:27
Also in: linux-arm-msm

Hi Greg,

On Wed, 31 Mar 2021 at 12:44, Greg KH [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:39:09PM +0200, Loic Poulain wrote:
quoted
This change introduces initial support for a WWAN subsystem. Given the
complexity and heterogeneity of existing WWAN hardwares and interfaces,
there is no strict definition of what a WWAN device is and how it should
be represented. It's often a collection of multiple devices that perform
the global WWAN feature (netdev, tty, chardev, etc).

One usual way to expose modem controls and configuration is via high
level protocols such as the well known AT command protocol, MBIM or
QMI. The USB modems started to expose that as character devices, and
user daemons such as ModemManager learnt how to deal with them. This
initial version adds the concept of WWAN port, which can be created
by any driver to expose one of these protocols. The WWAN core takes
care of the generic part, including character device creation and lets
the driver implementing access (fops) for the selected protocol.

Since the different components/devices do no necesserarly know about
each others, and can be created/removed in different orders, the
WWAN core ensures that all WAN ports that contribute to the whole
WWAN feature are grouped under the same virtual WWAN device, relying
on the provided parent device (e.g. mhi controller, USB device). It's
a 'trick' I copied from Johannes's earlier WWAN subsystem proposal.

This initial version is purposely minimalist, it's essentially moving
the generic part of the previously proposed mhi_wwan_ctrl driver inside
a common WWAN framework, but the implementation is open and flexible
enough to allow extension for further drivers.

Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <redacted>
---
 v2: update copyright (2021)
 v3: Move driver to dedicated drivers/net/wwan directory
 v4: Rework to use wwan framework instead of self cdev management
 v5: Fix errors/typos in Kconfig
 v6: - Move to new wwan interface, No need dedicated call to wwan_dev_create
     - Cleanup code (remove legacy from mhi_uci, unused defines/vars...)
     - Remove useless write_lock mutex
     - Add mhi_wwan_wait_writable and mhi_wwan_wait_dlqueue_lock_irq helpers
     - Rework locking
     - Add MHI_WWAN_TX_FULL flag
     - Add support for NONBLOCK read/write

 drivers/net/Kconfig          |   2 +
 drivers/net/Makefile         |   1 +
 drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig     |  22 +++
 drivers/net/wwan/Makefile    |   7 +
 drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c | 317 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/wwan.h         |  73 ++++++++++
 6 files changed, 422 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/Makefile
 create mode 100644 drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c
 create mode 100644 include/linux/wwan.h
diff --git a/drivers/net/Kconfig b/drivers/net/Kconfig
index 5895905..74dc8e24 100644
--- a/drivers/net/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/Kconfig
@@ -502,6 +502,8 @@ source "drivers/net/wan/Kconfig"

 source "drivers/net/ieee802154/Kconfig"

+source "drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig"
+
 config XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND
      tristate "Xen network device frontend driver"
      depends on XEN
diff --git a/drivers/net/Makefile b/drivers/net/Makefile
index 040e20b..7ffd2d0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/net/Makefile
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SUNGEM_PHY) += sungem_phy.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_WAN) += wan/
 obj-$(CONFIG_WLAN) += wireless/
 obj-$(CONFIG_IEEE802154) += ieee802154/
+obj-$(CONFIG_WWAN) += wwan/

 obj-$(CONFIG_VMXNET3) += vmxnet3/
 obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_FRONTEND) += xen-netfront.o
diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig b/drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..545fe54
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/wwan/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#
+# Wireless WAN device configuration
+#
+
+menuconfig WWAN
+     bool "Wireless WAN"
+     help
+       This section contains Wireless WAN driver configurations.
+
+if WWAN
+
+config WWAN_CORE
+     tristate "WWAN Driver Core"
+     help
+       Say Y here if you want to use the WWAN driver core. This driver
+       provides a common framework for WWAN drivers.
+
+       To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module will be
+       called wwan.
+
+endif # WWAN
diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/Makefile b/drivers/net/wwan/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..934590b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/wwan/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#
+# Makefile for the Linux WWAN device drivers.
+#
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_WWAN_CORE) += wwan.o
+wwan-objs += wwan_core.o
diff --git a/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7d9e2643
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/net/wwan/wwan_core.c
@@ -0,0 +1,317 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/* Copyright (c) 2021, Linaro Ltd <loic.poulain@linaro.org> */
+
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/idr.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/wwan.h>
+
+#define WWAN_MAX_MINORS 256 /* Allow the whole available cdev range of minors */
That's not the "whole range of minors" at all...
Though minor is 20-bit wide, Is 256 not the maximum number of minors
when using register_chrdev()?
And what are you using this chardev for at all?  All you have is an
open() call, but you have nothing to do with it after that.  What is it
for?

confused,
The WWAN framework acts a bit like misc or sound frameworks here, the
fops are not directly implemented by WWAN core but passed by the port
driver as parameter on WWAN port registration.There is no real benefit
of having them implemented in WWAN core since it would mostly consist
in forwarding read/write to the 'port driver' (at least for now).

Thanks,
Loic

greg k-h
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help