Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: dsa: Allow default tag protocol to be overridden from DT
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2021-03-28 22:05:50
Also in:
linux-devicetree
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 12:53:09AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 05:52:43PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:quoted
quoted
+static int dsa_switch_setup_tag_protocol(struct dsa_switch *ds) +{ + const struct dsa_device_ops *tag_ops = ds->dst->tag_ops; + struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst; + int port, err; + + if (tag_ops->proto == dst->default_proto) + return 0; + + if (!ds->ops->change_tag_protocol) { + dev_err(ds->dev, "Tag protocol cannot be modified\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++) { + if (!(dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, port) || dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port))) + continue;dsa_is_dsa_port() is interesting. Do we care about the tagging protocol on DSA ports? We never see that traffic?I believe this comes from me (see dsa_switch_tag_proto_match). I did not take into consideration at that time the fact that Marvell switches can translate between DSA and EDSA. So I assumed that every switch in the tree needs a notification about the tagging protocol, not just the top-most one.
Hi Vladimir
static int mv88e6xxx_setup_port_mode(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port)
{
if (dsa_is_dsa_port(chip->ds, port))
return mv88e6xxx_set_port_mode_dsa(chip, port);
So DSA ports, the ports connecting two switches together, are hard
coded to use DSA.
if (dsa_is_user_port(chip->ds, port))
return mv88e6xxx_set_port_mode_normal(chip, port);
/* Setup CPU port mode depending on its supported tag format */
if (chip->info->tag_protocol == DSA_TAG_PROTO_DSA)
return mv88e6xxx_set_port_mode_dsa(chip, port);
if (chip->info->tag_protocol == DSA_TAG_PROTO_EDSA)
return mv88e6xxx_set_port_mode_edsa(chip, port);
CPU ports can be configured to DSA or EDSA.
The switches seem happy to translate between DSA and EDSA as needed.
Andrew